Teams

MD.Oldham

2022 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-09vs TOC.IrishLost 01
L#3 SinglesJennifer Oldham vs Yelizaveta Petrova6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2022-08-02vs TOC.EvansSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBrinette Myers vs Omojojadavwe Suzette Morales2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesChristi-Ann Wiltberger vs Desiree Evans6-2, 6-3
2022-07-25vs PW.StegmanWon 10
W#3 SinglesJennifer Alviano vs Allison Lagstrom6-4, 6-4
2022-06-29vs PW.KraftLost 01
L#2 SinglesChristi-Ann Wiltberger vs Penny Kraft6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-21vs TOHS.FinnWon 10
W#3 SinglesJennifer Alviano vs Kelli Moore6-2, 6-4
2022-06-15vs TOC.GuerraSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrinette Myers vs Lora Guerra6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJennifer Alviano vs Jessenia Delos Santos3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Brigette Flower
published 4
3.19
Angie Bostrom
published 3.5
3.13
Meredith Heath
published
2.87
Christi-Ann Wiltberger
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.83
Stefanie Logue
published
Jennifer Oldham
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.70
Brinette Myers
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.67
Jennifer Alviano
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Heath + Christi-Ann Wiltberger5266% games+13.0% vs expected
Jennifer Alviano + Jennifer Oldham1440% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Oldham + Christi-Ann Wiltberger224 matchesnot enough data
Brinette Myers + Jennifer Oldham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brigette Flower
179W–59L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Angie Bostrom
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Meredith Heath
41W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.13
3
Christi-Ann Wiltberger
61W–66L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
Stefanie Logue
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Jennifer Oldham
61W–42L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
Brinette Myers
92W–79L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Jennifer Alviano
54W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.