Teams

Saddlebrook - L. Barbetta

2023 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-11vs Cheval Stallions - R. BensingerWon 10
W#1 DoublesRaymond Haga / George Zabala vs Todd Abrams / Sundar Srinivasan6-1, 6-4
2023-03-04vs Buckhorn We The Ones - J. TorresWon 10
W#1 SinglesThach Dinh vs Daniel Bulso6-0, 7-5
2023-02-04vs HCC - BiezunskiLost 01
L#1 SinglesThach Dinh vs Miguel Angel Goni Rodrigo2-6, 0-3
2023-01-28vs HG Krush Groov - E. CollinsWon 20
W#1 SinglesThach Dinh vs Dane Houston6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRaymond Haga / George Zabala vs Doug Angelone / Quyen Nguyen6-4, 6-1
2023-01-21vs West Meadows - C. KarkourWon 10
W#3 DoublesGeorge Zabala / Raymond Haga vs Anthony Olvey / Walter Carpenter6-3, 6-0
2023-01-14Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRaymond Haga / R Fotheringham vs Luis Dinamarca / Roy Wissel6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Vinicius de Souza
published
3.84
Adam Crane
published 4
3.83
Thach Dinh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.82
Justin Li
published
3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
3.61
Raymond Haga
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Good Oh
published
Jonathan Darlison
published
Marcos Pinheiro
published
R Fotheringham
published
Robert Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Albert Alhadeff + Vinicius de Souza213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vinicius de Souza
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Adam Crane
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
Thach Dinh
36W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
Justin Li
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Raymond Haga
51W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.61
Good Oh
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonathan Darlison
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcos Pinheiro
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
R Fotheringham
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Miller
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.