Teams

BC-PalosVerdesTC/SteveLiaw

2021 SCTA DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-04vs BC-Kramer/BrianKebschullLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Corman / Loyd Villanueva vs Kevin Escobar / Nicholas Starinieri4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-11-20vs BC-WestEnd/ArtWongWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Mullarkey / Roland Rietz vs Andy Frommenwiler / Wil Chao5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-11-13vs BC-MCC/TonyRojkoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteven Lau / Robert Mullarkey vs Jeff Brunner / Tony Rojko6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Shapiro / Loyd Villanueva vs David Chang / Doug Nishida4-6, 2-6
2021-11-06vs BC-LLW-BillieJeanKingTC/KazKataokaLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Corman / Robert Mullarkey vs Tak Takeda / OSAMU MATSUDA1-6, 4-6
2021-10-30vs BC-Peninsula/JesseWuWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Mullarkey / John Shigekawa vs Jesse Wu / Raul Vargas6-3, 6-4
2021-10-16vs BC-AltaVista/RobertGillWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Lau / Robert Mullarkey vs Wen Hsin / Larry Kolk6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-10-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Mullarkey / Loyd Villanueva vs Jonathan Rapoport / Scott Salisbury2-6, 3-6
2021-09-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLoyd Villanueva / Benjamin Shapiro vs Romeo Ponteres / Nilesh Vora3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
David Cheng
published 4
3.80
Josh Goldstein
published
3.78
Loyd Villanueva
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Steve Liaw
published
3.71
John Shigekawa
published
3.69
Ronald Kong
published
3.42
Robert Mullarkey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Thad Malit
published
3.11
Jonathan Lane
published
3.00
Tom Wheeler
published
Roland Rietz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Cheng
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.85
Josh Goldstein
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Loyd Villanueva
29W–38L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Christopher Corman
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Liaw
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
John Shigekawa
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
Ronald Kong
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Robert Mullarkey
48W–59L career · 10 lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
3.42
Thad Malit
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
Jonathan Lane
8W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%20%80%
3.11
Tom Wheeler
5W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.00
Roland Rietz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.