Teams

We Canh Do It 4.5

Adult Tri-Level League · Tri Level Men 3.5-4.5 Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / PHILADELPHIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · Tri Level Men 3.5-4.5 Saturday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1United 4.5 Tri000000
2Great Valley 12.0000000
3Aces 12.0 Tri000000
4We Canh Do It 4.5000000
5Naylor's Run000000
6Upper Dublin Wolfhounds000000
7Trust the Process000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Canh Ho
published 4.5
4.16
Joshua Budman
published
4.15
Scott Rubens
published
4.14
Charles Triolo
published 4.5
4.00
Allen Cheung
published 4
3.88
Jonathan Lu
published
3.85
Hefei Liu
published
3.84
Jordan Poznick
published
3.44
Pavan Kumar
published
3.40
Minh Lu
published
3.38
Chris Cappelli
published 3.5
Po Hu
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Canh Ho
255W–118L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
Joshua Budman
16W–12L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
4.16
Scott Rubens
44W–21L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Charles Triolo
44W–22L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
4.14
4
Allen Cheung
61W–71L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
Jonathan Lu
68W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Hefei Liu
24W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Jordan Poznick
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Pavan Kumar
27W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Minh Lu
8W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Chris Cappelli
43W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Po Hu
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.