Teams

Ra.Raj18C

2026 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-25vs Sp.Anderson18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Harris / Jeff Jugan vs Jody Anderson / Kevin Mann7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoey Post / Michael Cassibry vs Anthony Gentile / Robb Wroblewski4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRajiv Raj / Cameron McNeill vs Kevin Kirkup / Ryan Schanz0-6, 1-6
2026-08-11vs Da.Wascher18CLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Harris / Jeff Jugan vs Reid Watson / Brent Berry4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Cassibry / Joey Post vs Steve Abourisk / Nathaniel Turck6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRajiv Raj / Zhe Lyu vs Ronald Jackson / Mark Schueller3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 5.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sp.Anderson18C2042550
2Da.Wascher18C2154985
3Ma.Morriston18C1142552
4De.Farmer18C5.51124854
5Ra.Raj18C0112532
6Sh.Littleton18C0224965

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Charles Clift
published 3
2.90
Robert Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Barry Gitarts
published 3
2.77
Hogan Ellis
published
2.72
Joey Post
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Brian Buckingham
published 3
2.61
Cameron McNeill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Zhe Lyu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Michael Cassibry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Kevin Buckingham
published
2.44
Jeff Jugan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Len Swanson
published
2.30
Rajiv Raj
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Clift + Hogan Ellis314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Cassibry + Joey Post213 matchesnot enough data
Zhe Lyu + Barry Gitarts033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Charles Clift
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Robert Harris
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Barry Gitarts
30W–54L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Hogan Ellis
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.77
3
Joey Post
32W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72
3
Brian Buckingham
5W–14L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Cameron McNeill
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Zhe Lyu
16W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Michael Cassibry
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.58
Kevin Buckingham
5W–11L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Jeff Jugan
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Len Swanson
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Rajiv Raj
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.