Teams

Slice Queens

2025 Prince Georges Adult 18-39 · Prince Georges 6.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-06vs LoVV 18-39Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesJasmine Miles / Dayesha Sims vs Jasmine Boyd / Dhivya Rani Shankaran6-4, 7-5
2025-08-23vs LoVV 18-39Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesJasmine Miles / Dayesha Sims vs Emily Harris / Esme Rogers6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-16vs LoVV 18-39Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesAshton Brown / Ayanna Charles vs Kimberly Smith / Samantha Sherod6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-08Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesAshton Brown / Ayanna Charles vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-03vs LoVV 18-39Won 20
W#1 Female DoublesAyanna Charles / Ashton Brown vs SHAMEKA JENNINGS / Emily Harris6-0, 7-6
W#3 Female DoublesJasmine Miles / Dayesha Sims vs Kimberly Smith / Dana Bernard6-3, 6-2
2025-07-13vs LoVV 18-39Split 11
W#1 Female DoublesAshton Brown / Ayanna Charles vs Samantha Sherod / Kimberly Smith6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesNellie Foosaner / Jasmine Miles vs SHAMEKA JENNINGS / Fernanda Brown6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-29vs LoVV 18-39Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesAyanna Charles / Ashton Brown vs Dhivya Rani Shankaran / Esme Rogers6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-21vs LoVV 18-39Lost 02
L#1 Female DoublesAyanna Charles / Paige Chapman vs Dhivya Rani Shankaran / SHAMEKA JENNINGS1-6, 2-6
L#2 Female DoublesJasmine Miles / Dayesha Sims vs Samantha Sherod / Esme Rogers1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Nellie Foosaner
published
2.91
Ayanna Charles
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Dayesha Sims
published 3
2.75
Ashton Brown
published 3
2.68
Jasmine Miles
usually #2 Female Doubles 80%, also #3 Female Doubles 20% · published 3
2.46
Latonya Lewis
published
2.44
Dana Willard
published 2.5
2.37
Paige Chapman
published
Jade Williams
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nellie Foosaner
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Ayanna Charles
32W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Dayesha Sims
3W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ashton Brown
33W–27L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Jasmine Miles
43W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Latonya Lewis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.46
2.5
Dana Willard
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
Paige Chapman
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.37
Jade Williams
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.