Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Wang-WN-SA12

2022 Adult 18-39 Doubles League · SGV 18-39 Doubles 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.08 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-27vs SGV The Noobies- Lee-WN-SU 2Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesAdrienne Beauvois / Tammy Hung vs Katrina Leong / Angelica Ramos6-2, 6-2
2022-08-14Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesAdrienne Beauvois / Cara Hofstad vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-13vs SGV The Noobies- Lee-WN-SU 2Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesCara Hofstad / Tammy Hung vs Rylie Borje / Faye Patterson6-3, 6-3
W#1 Female DoublesCara Hofstad / Jane Wang vs Charmaine Felix-Meyer / Alexandra Pichugina6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV 18-39 Doubles 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
published 4.5
4.27
Colin Tang
published 4
4.22
Ryan Cox
published
4.07
Jasmine Dai
published
3.79
Adrienne Beauvois
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Cara Hofstad
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
Gustavo Banderas
published 4
3.74
Ernie Maldonado
published 4
3.49
Willie Yeh
published
3.40
Laurie Manley
published
3.31
Jocelyn Lee
published
3.28
Peter Yen
published
3.15
Tammy Hung
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrienne Beauvois + Cara Hofstad13856% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
18W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
4
Colin Tang
17W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%2%98%
4.27
Ryan Cox
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
Jasmine Dai
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Adrienne Beauvois
152W–120L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Cara Hofstad
218W–155L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Gustavo Banderas
0W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ernie Maldonado
3W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Willie Yeh
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
Laurie Manley
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.40
Jocelyn Lee
18W–3L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31
Peter Yen
6W–20L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.28
Tammy Hung
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.