Teams

Lakes/Fain-Bingham W3.5

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for W3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Julie Hoang
published
3.66
Ryane Criswell
published
3.48
Erika Meade
published
3.45
Carlin Mihm
published 3.5
3.45
Brenda Bingham
published 3.5
3.39
Tracy Constantino
published
3.37
Jill Fain
published
3.35
Nicole McAfee
published
3.35
Heidi Fuller
published
3.33
Jennifer Lazar
published
3.29
Elizabeth Maurice
published
3.26
Allison Leeper
published 3.5
3.23
Sonia Vargas
published
3.23
Sarah Herman
published
3.15
Sara Bowersox
published
3.14
Phyllis McGahey
published
3.04
Kimberly Gammill
published
2.94
Melanie Leach
published
Irina Owens
published
Sunny Hwang
published
Tamra Bryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Leeper + Carlin Mihm3253% gamesnot enough data
Sonia Vargas + Sarah Herman4163% gamesnot enough data
Ryane Criswell + Julie Hoang404 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Fuller + Tracy Constantino224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Maurice + Tracy Constantino213 matchesnot enough data
Carlin Mihm + Jennifer Lazar033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Hoang
39W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
Ryane Criswell
18W–17L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Erika Meade
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Carlin Mihm
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Brenda Bingham
19W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
Tracy Constantino
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.39
Jill Fain
23W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
Nicole McAfee
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Heidi Fuller
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Jennifer Lazar
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Elizabeth Maurice
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Allison Leeper
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Sonia Vargas
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Sarah Herman
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Sara Bowersox
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Phyllis McGahey
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Kimberly Gammill
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Melanie Leach
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.94
Irina Owens
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sunny Hwang
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tamra Bryan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.