Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/6.0/Delgado/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-21Split 11
W#2 DoublesZaira Delgado / Alejandro Gomez vs Roman Hernandez / Kara Hurd4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesArturo Anaya / Marisa Porras vs Kevin Woodson / Eufemia Garcia7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2025-08-07Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRicardo Gustavo Tuda Vargas / Silvana Corella vs Ruben Ramirez / Monica Ramirez5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesArturo Anaya / Brenda Campos Chacon vs Carlos Reza / Samantha Johnson4-6, 3-6
2025-08-04Split 11
W#2 DoublesCamila Olmos / Alejandro Gomez vs Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa / Daniel Rojas6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVictor Reta / Rocio Avila vs JOSE MENDEZ / Luisa Franco0-6, 2-6
2025-07-26Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Castaneda / Pablo Rangel vs Alexa Lopez / Ivan Ortiz1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCamila Olmos / Alejandro Gomez vs Fernanda Rodriguez / Efren Becerra6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-21vs GEPTA/18&overMX/6.0/Wilcox/TWWon 20
W#2 DoublesVictor Reta / Rocio Avila vs Oren Belkin / Brettney Dee Wilcox6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCamila Olmos / Alejandro Gomez vs Idaly Rios / Gabriel Delgado6-2, 6-1
2025-07-14Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRicardo Gustavo Tuda Vargas / Silvana Corella vs Allene Mirazo / Jeremy Frank3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Castaneda / Pablo Rangel vs Enrique Mirazo / Jessica Bordier5-7, 4-6
2025-07-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSilvana Corella / Victor Reta vs Anita Boss / Karl Walter3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-07Won 20
W#2 DoublesPablo Rangel / Sandra Castaneda vs Gerardo Gomez / AYLEEN PACE6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlejandro Gomez / Angelica Neve vs Craig Fortune / Regina Porras6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-16Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRicardo Gustavo Tuda Vargas / Silvana Corella vs Alejandro Borunda / Yuri Caire2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPablo Rangel / Rocio Avila vs Robert Hoy / Daniela Szostek4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesCamila Olmos / Alejandro Gomez vs Norm Estrada / Ana Navedo6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Camila Olmos
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.79
Brenda Campos Chacon
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
Arturo Anaya
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Alejandro Gomez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Angelica Neve
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Gabriel Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Juan Contreras
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Pablo Rangel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ricardo Gustavo Tuda Vargas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rocio Avila
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Roma Fonseca
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Sandra Castaneda
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Silvana Corella
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Victor Reta
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Zaira Delgado
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Castaneda + Angelica Neve3648% gamesnot enough data
Roma Fonseca + Rocio Avila3441% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Castaneda + Roma Fonseca3254% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Castaneda + Rocio Avila4151% gamesnot enough data
Camila Olmos + Alejandro Gomez4166% gamesnot enough data
Roma Fonseca + Angelica Neve224 matchesnot enough data
Pablo Rangel + Sandra Castaneda123 matchesnot enough data
Zaira Delgado + Alejandro Gomez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Camila Olmos
28W–5L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Brenda Campos Chacon
25W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Arturo Anaya
0W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Alejandro Gomez
8W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Angelica Neve
30W–33L career · 30 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Gabriel Chavez
18W–10L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Juan Contreras
10W–10L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pablo Rangel
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ricardo Gustavo Tuda Vargas
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rocio Avila
58W–30L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roma Fonseca
55W–32L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Castaneda
59W–46L career · 33 lines in 2025
not enough data
Silvana Corella
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victor Reta
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zaira Delgado
54W–34L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.