Teams

Norbeck Blue Belles

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-14vs Girls Just Want to Have Fun!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCeleste Henry / Christine Nowack vs Janet Wu / Gail Kelleher6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-12-05vs FuntennisLost 02
L#2 DoublesChristine Nowack / Linda Ginsburg vs Jan Brito / Mary Barton-Dock3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Seek / Jackie Solomon vs Marie Kelly / Melissa Lim2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-11-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Solomon / KATIE KELLY vs Angie Norris / Dina Rachuba6-3, 6-1
2023-11-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Mayer / Jackie Solomon vs Susan Friedman / Katy Beach4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-14vs Arlington CrushersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Solomon / Nancy Hull vs Sarah Trimmer / Katherine Pinho6-4, 6-4
2023-11-07vs Anything But NetLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Hjelle / Christine Nowack vs Marie Israelite / Hillary Wilner6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-11-02vs Making a RacketWon 10
W#3 DoublesFreddi Weiner / Jackie Solomon vs Gay Trinkner / Tamar Henkin6-4, 7-6
2023-10-27vs Chicks with SticksWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Nowack / Stephanie Hooker vs Nancy Cooper / Caroline McLoughlin6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Pamela Hjelle
published
3.61
KATIE KELLY
published
3.46
Christine Nowack
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.43
Celeste Henry
published 3.5
3.42
Christine Willey
published 3.5
3.30
Jackie Solomon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Stephanie Hooker
published
3.25
Nancy Hull
published
3.20
Linda Ginsburg
published
Freddi Weiner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackie Solomon + Christine Nowack4166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Hjelle
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
KATIE KELLY
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Christine Nowack
45W–39L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Celeste Henry
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Christine Willey
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Jackie Solomon
49W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Stephanie Hooker
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Nancy Hull
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Linda Ginsburg
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Freddi Weiner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.