Teams

CM YELLOW

2025 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-06vs GAC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Milliken / Alison Thompson vs Rebecca Givens / Jerry Augustin0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBethany Chang / Chris Chang vs Anne Campbell / Brian Tanner6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Cook / Gordon Smith vs Leslie Appiah / Andy Garrobo6-7, 6-7
2025-07-02vs EM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesMegan Fredricks / Pete Fredricks vs Ellen Leher / Mark Leher7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMargot Kelly / David Goetz vs Joy Jensen / David Jensen6-2, 6-3
2025-06-29vs SKY REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Goetz / Margot Kelly vs Andrew Hagen / Lee Hagen2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBethany Chang / Steven Tamez vs Tim Godzich / Beth Godzich6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPete Fredricks / Megan Fredricks vs Jennifer Rigsby / Charles Kuhn6-1, 6-2
2025-06-22vs DTC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Goetz / Margot Kelly vs Marcy Eastman / Evan Pfaff6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMegan Fredricks / Pete Fredricks vs Monica Denler / John Denler6-1, 6-4
2025-06-15vs GTC ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Cook / Patrick Kehoe vs Andrew Horning / KERRY HANSON6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Fredricks / Pete Fredricks vs Christopher Gilbert / Kathy Owens6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlison Thompson / David Milliken vs Karin French / John Thompson6-2, 6-2
2025-06-01vs SKY BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Cook / Gordon Smith vs Rebecca Schneider / Larry Schneider6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnne Gordon / David Goetz vs John Sanders / Angie Sanders3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChris Chang / Bethany Chang vs David Marom / Jenifer Marom6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTC-D ORANGE6116512136
2CM YELLOW5112614141
3PRKR BLUE5214716147
4NJ SILVER43111023175
5HG YELLOW4391228212
6SS-LT BLUE34101124200
7BRMST GOLD3491227205
8RMTC YELLOW3481328207
9KC-CC YELLOW2481020147
10RRTC BLUE2581326179
11GTC ORANGE1571123177
12BCST YELLOW1551327169
13ARCA BLUE1651632205
14FOX YELLOW1651633220
15BCST ORANGE0601836216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Steven Tamez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Chris Chang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Megan Fredricks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Pete Fredricks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.00
Patrick Kehoe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
David Goetz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
Gordon Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
David Milliken
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Bethany Chang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Anne Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Alison Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Margot Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Fredricks + Pete Fredricks13466% games+11.1% vs expected
Chris Chang + Megan Fredricks5258% games+6.0% vs expected
Bethany Chang + Pete Fredricks6064% games+5.5% vs expected
Margot Kelly + David Goetz271255% games+5.2% vs expected
Bethany Chang + Chris Chang161154% games+0.9% vs expected
Alison Thompson + David Milliken21035% games−8.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Tamez
55W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Chris Chang
69W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Megan Fredricks
56W–25L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
3
Pete Fredricks
66W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Patrick Kehoe
44W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
David Goetz
83W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Gordon Smith
58W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
David Milliken
31W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Bethany Chang
47W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anne Gordon
23W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Alison Thompson
39W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
Margot Kelly
84W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.