Teams

RGogate (Blakeney)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Tues PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-03vs CSwaminathan (Blakeney)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRamesh Thyagarajan / Avery Britt vs Chandrasekar Swaminathan / Diego Pazo2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPhillip Osborne vs Lawrence Jinks6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNaveen Sharma / Rishi Gogate vs Rick Craig / Ricky Marks3-6, 4-6
2022-04-19vs RPietrykowski (PPRSC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNaveen Sharma / Ramesh Thyagarajan vs Ken Griffin / Rich Pietrykowski5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRishi Gogate / John Robinson vs Andrew Ross / Rod Wilkes5-7, 1-6
2022-04-05vs DGrindstaff (Carmel CC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRamesh Thyagarajan / Avery Britt vs Chris Bauer / Daniel Nunn7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRishi Gogate / John Robinson vs David Grindstaff / Thomas Kraus6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-29vs CSwaminathan (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNaveen Sharma / Rishi Gogate vs Rick Craig / Robert Major0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRamesh Thyagarajan / Rohan Arora vs Chandrasekar Swaminathan / Hakan Pehrsson2-6, 4-6
2022-03-22vs JDSemones (OPRC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesAvery Britt / Phillip Osborne vs Sean Hickey / Loren Kane7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRishi Gogate / Bradford Hood vs Barry Pronier / Jonathan Vreeland3-6, 6-7
2022-03-17vs MKnowles/MSansotta (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAvery Britt / Ramesh Thyagarajan vs Dean Rasmussen / Mario Sansotta6-1, 6-0
2022-02-22vs RPietrykowski (PPRSC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesRishi Gogate / Avery Britt vs Dan Zakerski / Andrew Ross3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNaveen Sharma / Ramesh Thyagarajan vs Ken Griffin / Alven Weil3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Bradford Hood
published 4
3.70
Ramesh Thyagarajan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Andrew Hocek
published 4
3.56
Naveen Sharma
published
3.33
Rishi Gogate
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Phillip Osborne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradford Hood + Rishi Gogate3545% games−1.9% vs expected
Ramesh Thyagarajan + Rishi Gogate2442% games−4.3% vs expected
Bradford Hood + Naveen Sharma033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bradford Hood
50W–53L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Ramesh Thyagarajan
70W–73L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Andrew Hocek
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Naveen Sharma
24W–25L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Rishi Gogate
47W–76L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Phillip Osborne
37W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.