Teams

Hawk - Fox/Howell

2022 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-21vs Hawk - CoxWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristen Crevasse / Rhoda Wilburn vs Jodi Cox / Quynn Gingrich6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Howell / Tania Alavi vs Cara Duffaut / Haesuk Park6-2, 6-3
2022-05-17vs ALACHUA - 300 - SumerlinWon 10
W#1 DoublesRhoda Wilburn / Tania Alavi vs Lauren Groff / Laura Muchnick6-3, 6-4
2022-05-07vs JTC - ZaldivarSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Love / Tania Alavi vs Kim Newsom / Melinda Hartline6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Fudge / Danielle McGriff vs Jaime Jenkins / Annalize Britz6-3, 6-0
2022-05-06vs ALACHUA - 300 - SumerlinLost 01
L#3 DoublesDanielle McGriff / Rachel Brock vs Victoria Verunac / Rachael Seidler4-6, 3-6
2022-04-27vs JTC - ZaldivarWon 21
W#1 DoublesTania Alavi / Andrea Love vs Sriyani Dissanayake / Melinda Hartline6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHebah Fox / Rhoda Wilburn vs DAHAO LING / Annalize Britz6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDanielle McGriff / Jennifer Cassisi vs Blythe Karow / Laura Davis1-6, 2-6
2022-04-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesTania Alavi / Elizabeth Howell vs Amy Whitaker / Quynn Gingrich6-3, 6-3
2022-04-15vs WS - Spink/RodriguezWon 10
W#1 DoublesTania Alavi / Andrea Love vs Camille Pauly / Linda Garcia-Crespo6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Rhoda Wilburn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Mara Rodriguez
published
3.43
Andrea Love
published 3.5
3.29
Tania Alavi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Howell
published 3.5
3.19
Hebah Fox
published 3.5
3.14
Cynthia Lewis
published 3.5
3.11
Kelly Haager
published
2.68
Danielle McGriff
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhoda Wilburn + Tania Alavi5070% gamesnot enough data
Rhoda Wilburn + Danielle McGriff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rhoda Wilburn
86W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Mara Rodriguez
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Andrea Love
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Tania Alavi
140W–84L career · 10 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Elizabeth Howell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Hebah Fox
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cynthia Lewis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Kelly Haager
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Danielle McGriff
72W–83L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.