Teams

LPalmer (Raintree)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-28vs NKosel/SChandler (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne MacVicar / Katharine Williams vs Sarah Prochaska / Adriana Hall2-5
2022-04-21vs KLee/SChandra (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrea Caldini vs Amber Nee0-6, 2-6
2022-04-14vs SRock/HFranc (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne MacVicar / Katharine Williams vs Shelley Crocker / Allyson McDonough0-6, 0-6
2022-04-07vs KMacrone/BDavis (Park Road)Split 11
L#2 DoublesSuzanne MacVicar / Shannon Burke vs Laura Grant / Barbara Davis3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAndrea Caldini vs Katherine Winfrey6-4, 6-3
2022-03-24vs LCulp/SDeVries (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesSuzanne MacVicar vs Sara DeVries2-6, 5-7
2022-03-10vs BBaker (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesSuzanne MacVicar / Chelsea Law vs Anna T Heath / Katherine Koppel-Dobbs1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAndrea Caldini vs Lauren Spanos3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-03vs NKosel/SChandler (Raintree)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAndrea Caldini vs Katie Eggers4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSuzanne MacVicar vs Kimberlee Curley1-6, 2-6
2022-02-24vs KLee/SChandra (Charlotte Indoor)Split 11
L#2 DoublesAlexis Schwartz / Suzanne MacVicar vs Lauren Olson / Mayela Magur2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAndrea Caldini vs Shruti Chandra6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Caroline Cox
published 3.5
2.83
Suzanne MacVicar
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Chelsea Law
published 3
2.74
Sara Shelor
published
2.72
Andrea Caldini
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.54
Marie Foley
published
2.35
Anje Seufert
published 2.5
2.13
Rebecca Plaisance
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Cox
13W–27L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Suzanne MacVicar
89W–101L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Chelsea Law
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Shelor
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Andrea Caldini
28W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
Marie Foley
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Anje Seufert
14W–28L career · no lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.35
Rebecca Plaisance
11W–30L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.