Teams

Mixed Shots 7.0x

2025 Montgomery Mixed 40 & Over · Montgomery Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-09vs New Wave 7.0xLost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Hazel / Charles Wardell vs Crystal Cornell / Max Wang0-6, 1-6
2025-06-03vs Tennis Fun 7.0xSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMeghan Smith / Matt Baumann vs Marie Israelite / Mario Olivero-Cabrera6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesYvette Fontenot / Johnny Yataco vs Wendy Beale / Surendra Babu3-6, 1-6
2025-05-16vs Tennis Fun 7.0xLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarron Fuller / Kim Hazel vs Surendra Babu / Kara Sun1-6, 2-6
2025-05-07vs New Wave 7.0xLost 02
L#1 DoublesGiuliana Rabah / Darron Fuller vs Evelyn Chan / Rick Liang0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Smith / Matt Baumann vs Tana Jankowiak / Warren Chen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-03vs Tennis Fun 7.0xLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatt Baumann / Andrea Schaechter vs Ruxandra Badiu / Mario Olivero-Cabrera0-4, 0-0
2025-04-21vs Tennis Fun 7.0xWon 20
W#1 DoublesGiuliana Rabah / Florin Iancu vs Bill Hartman / Kathryn Williams6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMeghan Smith / Matt Baumann vs Ruxandra Badiu / Avahrom Siegel6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Giuliana Rabah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Johnny Yataco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Meghan Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Matt Baumann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Penelope Bell
published
3.26
Florin Iancu
published
Brenda Kaechele
published 3.5
Charles Wardell
published 3.5
3.24
Yvette Fontenot
published
2.99
Kim Hazel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Telesia Hundley
published
Ivan Teelucksingh
published
Timothy Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Baumann + Meghan Smith5355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Giuliana Rabah
40W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Johnny Yataco
207W–116L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Meghan Smith
160W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Matt Baumann
225W–179L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Penelope Bell
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Florin Iancu
29W–34L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Brenda Kaechele
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Charles Wardell
0W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yvette Fontenot
17W–26L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Kim Hazel
98W–117L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
Telesia Hundley
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Ivan Teelucksingh
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Brown
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.