Teams

Carroll

2026 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 4.0 Men 18 & Over

5 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-28vs Basta/Janik CFCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDavid Kimbrough vs James Dawson1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesZachary Manfredi vs Johannes Haasbroek6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-02-25vs WeddleSplit 11
L#1 SinglesZachary Manfredi vs Robert Weins3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCorbin Carroll vs Matej Polomsky6-4, 6-4
2026-02-23vs Niggebrugge/PerezSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAndrew Gillespie vs Ibardo Zambrano6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesZachary Manfredi vs Jordan Niggebrugge2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJoshua Kleinstuber vs Michael Martorelli6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAndrew Gillespie vs Matthew Conzola6-3, 6-1
2026-01-31vs Basta/Janik CFCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesAndrew Gillespie vs James Dawson7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJoshua Kleinstuber vs Tim Rahauser6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesDavid Kimbrough vs Nick Basta6-2, 6-2
2026-01-21vs Niggebrugge/PerezLost 12
L#1 SinglesCorbin Carroll vs Guilherme Perez3-6, 1-1
W#2 SinglesAndrew Gillespie vs Jordan Niggebrugge3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesZachary Manfredi vs Mike O'Beirne4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesZachary Manfredi vs Maverick Maready6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesDavid Kimbrough vs Corey Kershaw6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-01-12vs WeddleSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAndrew Gillespie vs Christopher Soule6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesDavid Kimbrough vs Elijah Warren3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Men 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Niggebrugge/Perez6217715148
2McCabe/Martorelli/Matthews 18+ Singles44101432248
3Carroll35121226202
4Basta/Janik CFCC2671737255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Andrew Gillespie
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.91
Corbin Carroll
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.86
Joshua Kleinstuber
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.85
Zachary Manfredi
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.61
David Kimbrough
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corbin Carroll + Zachary Manfredi13463% games+3.9% vs expected
Joshua Kleinstuber + Corbin Carroll11856% games+3.2% vs expected
Joshua Kleinstuber + Zachary Manfredi7555% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Gillespie
17W–1L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
4.08
4
Corbin Carroll
104W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Joshua Kleinstuber
61W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Zachary Manfredi
108W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
3.5
David Kimbrough
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.