Teams

Ternes/Bates/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.5 Men - Sunday Daytime

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-10vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesMateus Fairbairn / Javier Saez vs Ali Murad / Daniel Schafer6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAlessandro Iriu vs Mark Sargent6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJacob Parrish / Brock Hurston vs James Fong / Spartacus Crawford4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-05-03vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesKory Craighead / Charlie Sevier vs Michael McKeown / Mark Sargent6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJacob Parrish vs Danny Nelson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMateus Fairbairn / Austin Racine vs Robert Grimes / James Fong6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesBradley Ternes vs Doug Story7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErick Hale / Charles Hawkins vs Connor Malchow / Spartacus Crawford3-6, 2-6
2026-04-26vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesMichael Yokosuk / Erick Hale vs Connor Malchow / James Fong6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBradley Ternes vs Daniel Oxford6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKory Craighead / Brock Hurston vs Matthew Bulow / Edmund Sauer6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMateus Fairbairn vs Michael McKeown6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJake Ward / Charles Hawkins vs Doug Story / Robert Grimes7-6, 6-3
2026-04-12vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesJake Ward / Charlie Sevier vs James Fong / Spartacus Crawford6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTyler Strong vs Charles McCray5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesErick Hale / Christopher Bates vs Doug Story / Edmund Sauer5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJacob Parrish vs Matthew Bulow6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBradley Ternes / Javier Saez vs Mark Sargent / Danny Nelson6-2, 6-3
2026-03-29vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleWon 41
L#1 DoublesJavier Saez / Charles Hawkins vs Connor Malchow / James Fong3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBradley Ternes vs Mesa Carlson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKory Craighead / Jake Ward vs Michael McKeown / Igor Shalkevich6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMateus Fairbairn vs Edmund Sauer7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChristopher Bates / Alessandro Iriu vs Doug Story / Daniel Schafer6-4, 7-5
2026-03-22vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleWon 32
L#1 DoublesMateus Fairbairn / Charles Hawkins vs Ryan Hitt / Mesa Carlson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAustin Racine vs Charles McCray6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Bates / Jacob Parrish vs Spartacus Crawford / Daniel Schafer6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBradley Ternes vs Edmund Sauer5-7, 3-3
L#3 DoublesMichael Yokosuk / Erick Hale vs Daniel Oxford / Doug Story7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.5 Men - Sunday Daytime
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ternes/Bates/Nashville6023718210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Austin Racine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.50
Jacob Parrish
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.49
Bradley Ternes
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.42
Kory Craighead
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.38
Charlie Sevier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Christopher Bates
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.37
Jake Ward
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.30
Mateus Fairbairn
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.26
Javier Saez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.19
Erick Hale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.19
Charles Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Tyler Strong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Alessandro Iriu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Michael Yokosuk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Hawkins + Javier Saez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Austin Racine
4W–0L career · type D · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jacob Parrish
25W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.50
4.5
Bradley Ternes
18W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
4.49
Kory Craighead
10W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
4.42
4.5
Charlie Sevier
17W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Christopher Bates
16W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
4.37
Jake Ward
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
Mateus Fairbairn
7W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.30
Javier Saez
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.26
Erick Hale
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Charles Hawkins
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Tyler Strong
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.13
4
Alessandro Iriu
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Yokosuk
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.