Teams

Shreveport Night - Hildebrand

55 & Over Adult Local At State - Women · 9.0 Combined Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-13vs Slidell - CalamariLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarla Hildebrand / Sheila Pernici vs Kimberly Calamari / Pam Brandner6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Cannon / Rebecca Mayo vs Maryanne Pranikoff / Cheryl Webster4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClaire Burgess / Vallery Albritton vs Mary Karas / Barbara Fitz-Hugh4-6, 4-6
2025-04-12vs Baton Rouge Night - SimpsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarla Hildebrand / Sheila Pernici vs Tracy Simpson / Lucille Bourgeois0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTammy Cannon / Rebecca Mayo vs Suzannah Townsend / Donna McGee6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesClaire Burgess / Vallery Albritton vs Sally Banta / Allyson Morris6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-11vs Slidell - CalamariWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarla Hildebrand / Sheila Pernici vs Mary Karas / Barbara Fitz-Hugh6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaire Burgess / Vallery Albritton vs Kimberly Calamari / Ann Melius0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTammy Cannon / Rebecca Mayo vs Barbara Claiborne / Maryanne Pranikoff6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-11vs Baton Rouge Night - SimpsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarla Hildebrand / Sheila Pernici vs Tracy Simpson / Suzannah Townsend7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesClaire Burgess / Vallery Albritton vs Donna McGee / Lucille Bourgeois6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTammy Cannon / Rebecca Mayo vs Allyson Morris / Sally Banta3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Combined Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Carla Hildebrand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Claire Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.02
Sheila Pernici
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Tammy Cannon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.90
Vallery Albritton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rebecca Mayo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Hildebrand + Sheila Pernici5650% games−12.9% vs expected
Tammy Cannon + Rebecca Mayo4354% gamesnot enough data
Claire Burgess + Vallery Albritton134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carla Hildebrand
19W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Claire Burgess
13W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Sheila Pernici
12W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Tammy Cannon
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Vallery Albritton
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Rebecca Mayo
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.