Teams

UPTA55C/Buturff/SpindleTree

2026 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Men - 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-29vs UPTA55C/Falciatano/ACACWon 30
W#1 DoublesDouglas Koban / Rodger Coubrough vs James Segura / Ken Walton6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLanny Holcomb / Kevin Turner vs Cesar Manent / Daniel Jacques6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJeff Buturff / Jerry Kortenber vs Steven Szabo / Terry Kent6-4, 7-5
2026-08-20vs UPTA55C/Cooper/BrookstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesRodger Coubrough / Douglas Koban vs Kyle Langill / Mark Peterman6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGuillermo Baltazar / Thomas Patterson vs Lucien Woorons / Mark Curin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLanny Holcomb / Jessy Grasso vs John Gaber / David Fisher6-2, 6-1
2026-08-15vs UPTA55C/Meredith/ACACWon 21
W#1 DoublesDouglas Koban / Rodger Coubrough vs Robert Cromley / Grant Hunter6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRoland Fournier / Guillermo Baltazar vs Brad Meredith / Harvinder Sidhu2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Patterson / Jessy Grasso vs Russell Shelley / Daryl Tracey7-5, 6-3
2026-08-08vs UPTA55C/Wood/KeoweeKeyWon 30
W#1 DoublesRodger Coubrough / Douglas Koban vs Gary Boyette / Robert Daffin6-0, 4-2
W#2 DoublesGuillermo Baltazar / Roland Fournier vs Kenneth Uhlig / Curt Ulliman6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJeff Buturff / Larry Smith vs Gerald Hendrick / Larry Wingard6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Combo Men - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Rodger Coubrough
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Lanny Holcomb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Guillermo Baltazar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Brian Tucker
published 4
3.54
Kevin Turner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Roland Fournier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Douglas Koban
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Thomas Patterson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Jeff Buturff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
John Moss
published
3.36
Jessy Grasso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessy Grasso + Roland Fournier4260% games+8.9% vs expected
Jessy Grasso + Jeff Buturff9362% games+2.4% vs expected
John Moss + Douglas Koban7258% games−2.9% vs expected
Rodger Coubrough + Douglas Koban9073% gamesnot enough data
Brian Tucker + Rodger Coubrough134 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Turner + Lanny Holcomb314 matchesnot enough data
Guillermo Baltazar + Roland Fournier123 matchesnot enough data
Lanny Holcomb + Rodger Coubrough303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rodger Coubrough
24W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
Lanny Holcomb
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Guillermo Baltazar
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Brian Tucker
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Kevin Turner
60W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
Roland Fournier
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Douglas Koban
29W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Thomas Patterson
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jeff Buturff
22W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
John Moss
11W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jessy Grasso
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.