Teams

MERVYN MORRIS PK CM8.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 8.5

20 players · average NTRP 4.29 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-02vs MEMORIAL-ALBANY CM8.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Richmond / Michael Rennels vs Benjamin Green / Henry Qi3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJose Ramirez / Long Luu vs Eric Smith / Mateus Fiamenghi7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPhil Beilin / Cesar Hernandez vs Roberto Olivares-Amaya / William Edman3-6, 2-6
2025-10-26vs MILLS COLLEGE CM8.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Richmond / Cesar Hernandez vs Raymond Huie / Brian Miller4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBryce Young / Michael Rennels vs Mark Cohrs / Bellal Daunish6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJacky Ng / Tuan Khong vs William Lukach III / Bryan Wendleton3-6, 1-6
2025-09-27vs MEMORIAL-ALBANY CM8.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Lowe / Shang Liu vs Damon Levy / Mateus Fiamenghi1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKhiem Tran / Long Luu vs William Edman / Eric Smith6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJacky Ng / Cesar Hernandez vs Roberto Olivares-Amaya / Matthew Moss3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJonathon Feyerherm / Manish Singh vs Chris Alexander / Alex James7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-21vs MILLS COLLEGE CM8.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Luu / Tuan Khong vs Joseph Cancino / William Warm7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesClifton Pang / Phil Beilin vs Raymond Huie / Bryan Wendleton6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesManish Singh / Jose Ramirez vs Daniel Lichtenberg / Matt Hipperson3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
David Richmond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Alex Kaiser
published 4.5
4.14
Bryce Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Kevin Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
David Luu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Jonathan Maze
published
3.94
Khiem Tran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Phil Beilin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Michael Rennels
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Issiah Cantrell
published
3.78
Tuan Khong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Shang Liu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Clifton Pang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Jacky Ng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Manish Singh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Byron Bardy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Long Luu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Cesar Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Samir Bhatnagar
published
Faser Carcallas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryce Young + Kevin Lowe224 matchesnot enough data
Jacky Ng + Tuan Khong134 matchesnot enough data
Cesar Hernandez + Tuan Khong033 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Maze + Kevin Lowe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Richmond
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Alex Kaiser
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Bryce Young
30W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Kevin Lowe
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
4.5
David Luu
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Jonathan Maze
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
Khiem Tran
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
Phil Beilin
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.90
Michael Rennels
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Issiah Cantrell
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.83
Tuan Khong
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Shang Liu
40W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Clifton Pang
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Jacky Ng
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Manish Singh
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Byron Bardy
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Long Luu
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Cesar Hernandez
2W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Samir Bhatnagar
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Faser Carcallas
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.