← Teams

SHC-Zielinski

2019 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.39 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Jeffrey Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
—
Lisa Gray
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
—
Steve Bidwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Carol Woolman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Steve Fogg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Brian Dehen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Amanda Solomon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Xia Wu
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.33
Babette Zielinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Adam Buchwald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-03-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSteve Bidwell / Lisa Gray vs Mike Mon / Bronwen Hager6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJim Rankin / Xia Wu vs James Feeney / Monika Dolega-kowalewski6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJaap Sparrius / Amanda Solomon vs Pamela Buckley / Brent Waddle7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2019-02-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAdam Buchwald / Carol Woolman vs Brent Waddle / Pamela Buckley6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesClaudia Ciobanu / Jeffrey Hunt vs Monika Dolega-kowalewski / Zachary Kinavey6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Campbell / Amanda Solomon vs Kelly Sharkey / Jeff Berman6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2019-02-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSteve Fogg / Lisa Gray vs Benjamin Yang / Annie Duong6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Hunt / Tanya O'Neil vs Doug Post / Christie Post6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrian Dehen / Carol Woolman vs Bryan Ward / Mary Jo Kallgren6-4, 6-0
2019-02-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSteve Bidwell / Xia Wu vs Brian Quisling / Donna Roisom6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBabette Zielinski / Bruce Reed vs David Finkelman / Lisa Lynch6-0, 6-2
2019-02-01Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesSteve Bidwell / Janine Paulson vs Nathan Austin / Kimberly Quach6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Dehen / Lisa Gray vs Eric Brennecke / Anne Fahlbusch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-01-18Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSteve Bidwell / Janine Paulson vs Bruce Levelle / Jill Chapman7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJaap Sparrius / Amanda Solomon vs Michael Skillman / Kim Gowie6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBruce Reed / Babette Zielinski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-01-11Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesLisa Gray / Steve Bidwell vs Theresa Mullally / Josh Schweitz6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesXia Wu / Jim Rankin vs Jack Yothers / Bo Yu6-0, 6-4
2019-01-04Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSteve Fogg / Lisa Gray vs Susan Ford / Quang Pham6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Hunt / Tanya O'Neil vs Ke Ounaphom / Heidi Affentranger6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Jackson / Carol Woolman vs Shannon DeVall / Bruce Herkamp6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Jeffrey Hunt
26W–18L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Lisa Gray
90W–56L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Steve Bidwell
60W–68L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Carol Woolman
31W–13L career · type S
1%96%3%
4.23
4.5
Steve Fogg
84W–67L career
0%99%1%
4.22
4.5
Brian Dehen
29W–44L career
7%87%6%
4.19
4.5
Amanda Solomon
138W–71L career
1%99%0%
4.18
4.5
Xia Wu
54W–79L career · type A
33%67%0%
3.92
3.5
Babette Zielinski
52W–66L career
0%97%3%
3.33
0
Adam Buchwald
4W–7L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.