Teams

Neel - Boonsboro Grinders

2025 Lynchburg Adult 18 & Over · Lynchburg Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-10vs Denham - Boonsboro On the RisersWon 31
L#1 DoublesWistar Nelligan / Bill Finigan vs Stuart Tinsley / Peter Betz3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJames Neel vs Leighton Denham6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStewart Langley / Phillip Sauls vs Ben Berry / Kenneth Terrell6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesPeter Ploch vs Clunet Pettyjohn4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-06vs Denham - Boonsboro On the RisersLost 23
L#1 DoublesLyons Davidson / James Neel vs Stuart Tinsley / Clunet Pettyjohn5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJason Bivens vs Leighton Denham6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCharlie Larson / Bill Finigan vs Lapsley Denham / Kenneth Hite6-1, 7-6
L#2 SinglesLandon Colling vs Kenneth Terrell6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStewart Langley / Phillip Miller vs John Bowden / William Eubank3-6, 2-6
2025-05-17vs Denham - Boonsboro On the RisersLost 14
L#1 DoublesJason Bivens / Wistar Nelligan vs Stuart Tinsley / Clunet Pettyjohn4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJames Neel vs Leighton Denham7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStewart Langley / Phillip Miller vs Kenneth Terrell / Tim Hellewell6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLandon Colling vs Lapsley Denham6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharlie Larson / William Daughtrey vs John Reitelbach / William Eubank3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-09vs Denham - Boonsboro On the RisersWon 41
L#1 DoublesPeter Ploch / Wistar Nelligan vs Stuart Tinsley / Clunet Pettyjohn2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJames Neel vs Leighton Denham7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBill Finigan / Charlie Larson vs Tim Hellewell / Kenneth Terrell6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesLandon Colling vs Lapsley Denham2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLyons Davidson / Stewart Langley vs John Bowden / Kenneth Hite6-1, 6-4
2025-05-03vs Denham - Boonsboro On the RisersWon 31
L#1 DoublesPhillip Sauls / Charlie Larson vs Peter Betz / Stuart Tinsley3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPeter Ploch vs Ben Berry6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPhillip Miller / Stewart Langley vs Tim Hellewell / Pierre Mortemousque6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBill Finigan / James Neel vs Kenneth Terrell / John Bowden6-0, 6-1
2025-04-27vs Denham - Boonsboro On the RisersLost 14
L#1 DoublesLyons Davidson / Peter Ploch vs Peter Betz / Stuart Tinsley5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJames Neel vs Ben Berry7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEdward Armfield / Charlie Larson vs Kenneth Terrell / John Bowden3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLandon Colling vs Clunet Pettyjohn6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStewart Langley / Phillip Miller vs Kenneth Hite / Tim Hellewell2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Bill Finigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
James Neel
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.65
Lyons Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Wistar Nelligan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Charlie Larson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Phillip Miller
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
William Daughtrey
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Edward Armfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Bivens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Landon Colling
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Peter Ploch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Phillip Sauls
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Stewart Langley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stewart Langley + Phillip Miller134 matchesnot enough data
Bill Finigan + Charlie Larson213 matchesnot enough data
James Neel + Lyons Davidson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Finigan
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
James Neel
18W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Lyons Davidson
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Wistar Nelligan
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Charlie Larson
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Phillip Miller
12W–9L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
William Daughtrey
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Edward Armfield
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jason Bivens
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Landon Colling
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Ploch
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Phillip Sauls
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stewart Langley
7W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.