Teams

Maximum Tennis Development Zone

2022 18&Over Women Day Winter · 2.5 Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.21 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-25vs Grand Slam: GrandslammersWon 21
W#1 DoublesIkue Totsuka / Akiko Senda vs Mira Schirripa / Shirley Xu-Weldon7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSaori Shimada / Kikuko Kojima vs Magdalena Chrostowski / Suzanne Oliva6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlexandra Dudar / Alison McCormack vs Maria Orozco / Stefani Scamardo-Haynes1-6, 1-6
2022-03-18vs Sportime Harbor IslandWon 21
L#1 DoublesAyako Shizuka / Saori Iwasaki vs Angela Eaves / Ravit Mandell4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAkiko Senda / Ikue Totsuka vs Ava Konwiser / Stephanie Meltzer6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmanda Tarangioli / Karen Vaites vs Calla Fiducia / Valerie Skolnick3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-04vs Westchester Country ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesIkue Totsuka / Kikuko Kojima vs Danielle Forster / Allison Brucato6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Dudar / Denise Mincak vs Deborah Maresca / Joanne Rivers6-7, 4-5
W#3 DoublesAyako Shizuka / Saori Shimada vs Katie Bellmare / Kerry Soliman6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-14vs Westchester Tennis CenterWon 20
W#1 DoublesIkue Totsuka / Saori Shimada vs Ana Dean / Keely Mann6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKikuko Kojima / Akiko Senda vs Heidi Helfst / Michelle Kantor6-3, 6-3
2022-02-09vs Armonk Tennis 2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesDenise Mincak / Alexandra Dudar vs Jeanmarie Mahecha / Lisa Beida7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSaori Iwasaki / Ayako Shizuka vs Christine Corr / Bianca Solorzano6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAkiko Senda / Amanda Tarangioli vs Tomoko Smith / Kathleen Bershad2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-01-31vs TIA GRINDERS 2.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Dudar / Akiko Senda vs Geetu Bedi / Renee Holder5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlison McCormack / Nataliya Gambino vs Cristy Eguiluz / Caryn Steuerman1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKikuko Kojima / Amanda Tarangioli vs Radhika Dewan / Raya Cottrell1-6, 2-6
2022-01-28vs Lifetime Athletic RubyLost 03
L#1 DoublesIkue Totsuka / Saori Shimada vs Angela Telles / Cailin Petracca4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNataliya Gambino / Karen Vaites vs Anita Ware / Tulika Khemani0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlison McCormack / Amanda Tarangioli vs Jenna Lebowich / Margaret Bedoya1-6, 3-6
2022-01-21vs Hardscrabble 2.5 TempestLost 02
L#1 DoublesAkiko Senda / Ikue Totsuka vs Monette Wilder / Christine Corrigan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDenise Mincak / Alexandra Dudar vs RAEGAN SEDLARCIK / Robin Fetto4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Mariko Abdel-Rahman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Misaki Reinoso
published
3.16
Denise Mincak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Alexandra Dudar
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.83
Nataliya Gambino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Akiko Senda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Alison McCormack
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Ikue Totsuka
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Amanda Tarangioli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ayako Shizuka
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kikuko Kojima
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Antonini
published
Saori Iwasaki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Saori Shimada
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Akiko Senda + Kikuko Kojima5263% games+13.2% vs expected
Alexandra Dudar + Denise Mincak3257% games+7.4% vs expected
Akiko Senda + Saori Iwasaki2343% gamesnot enough data
Akiko Senda + Ikue Totsuka224 matchesnot enough data
Alexandra Dudar + Saori Iwasaki404 matchesnot enough data
Saori Shimada + Ikue Totsuka314 matchesnot enough data
Ayako Shizuka + Saori Iwasaki123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mariko Abdel-Rahman
124W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Misaki Reinoso
64W–26L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Denise Mincak
54W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Alexandra Dudar
53W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Nataliya Gambino
38W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Akiko Senda
22W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Alison McCormack
27W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ikue Totsuka
9W–3L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Amanda Tarangioli
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ayako Shizuka
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kikuko Kojima
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Antonini
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Saori Iwasaki
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Saori Shimada
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.