Teams

OB - Wood

2025 Combo 18 & Over Night League - GS · 6.5 Adult Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-18vs GS - PolicelliSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Boll / Gabrielle Lenaz vs Liana Harris / Irina Matushchenko6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJamie Wood / Amanda Williamson vs Karin Seavey / Julie Perry6-4, 6-2
2025-08-05vs GS - PolicelliLost 12
L#1 DoublesFarrah Keel / Leona Lenaz vs Cheryl Jordan / Irina Matushchenko6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJamie Wood / Gabrielle Lenaz vs Julie Perry / Karen Buckner1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Littrell / Roxanne Bates vs Karin Seavey / Jennifer Hester4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-29vs GS - PolicelliLost 03
L#1 DoublesCyndi Patterson / Gabrielle Lenaz vs Jill Kunkel / Terri Ammons3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Ray / Amanda Williamson vs Tika Policelli / Lindsay McClure3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJamie Wood / Lisa Littrell vs Julie Perry / Jessica Lazzarino2-6, 1-6
2025-07-22vs GS - PolicelliLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Boll / Jenya Burkett vs Cheryl Jordan / Tika Policelli2-2
L#2 DoublesFarrah Keel / Leona Lenaz vs Jessica Lazzarino / Julie Perry6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Littrell / Roxanne Bates vs Jennifer Hester / Karin Seavey2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Stephanie Boll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Roxanne Bates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Farrah Keel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Kim Humphrey
published
2.93
Jamie Wood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Leanne Collins
published
2.84
Cyndi Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.76
Jenya Burkett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Amanda Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Lisa Littrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Renita Myers
published
Gabrielle Lenaz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Leona Lenaz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Boll
46W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
Roxanne Bates
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Farrah Keel
5W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Kim Humphrey
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jamie Wood
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Leanne Collins
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
3.5
Cyndi Patterson
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.84
Jenya Burkett
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Amanda Williamson
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Lisa Littrell
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Renita Myers
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
Gabrielle Lenaz
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leona Lenaz
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.