Teams

Miller 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Men Monday PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-24vs Hilliard 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Wallace / Jesse Arnett vs Huy Ho / Ashley Fuquay2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Roley / Lee Brogden vs Luke Rhoten / Jagdeep Singh2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBill Hitchcock / Jeff Ingle vs Robert Davis / Mark Williams2-6, 0-6
2026-08-23vs Chamberlin 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesRamesh Ravella / Lee Schneiderman vs Lawrence Cox / Charles Wright6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGraham Summerlee / Craig Wasserman vs Mike Mango / Chad Lackey3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStephen Miller / Bill Hitchcock vs Stewart Edmunds / Robert Hager0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-10vs Bueller 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesRamesh Ravella / Tom Barringer vs Chris Leggette / Kevin Grubb3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesScott Wallace / Jesse Arnett vs Wayne Hamilton / Coray Mitchell6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Roley / Russell Loseke vs Bryan Bly / Craig Freed4-6, 0-6
2026-08-03vs Majestic 40s 7.5 Combo Mon PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesKevin Roley / Ramesh Ravella vs Erik Linn / Tony Lancaster6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Wallace / Craig Wasserman vs Ken Questell / Andy Kirsteins5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLee Schneiderman / Stephen Miller vs David Grubbs / J Stacey Allred1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 7.5 40 & Over Men Monday PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM3072568
2Hilliard 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM2051341
3Bueller 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM2163867
4Majestic 40s 7.5 Combo Mon PM21451077
5Rossato 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM1133753
6Webster 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM12271599
7Jackson 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM0224863
8Chamberlin 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM0224961
9Miller 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM0224963

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Ramesh Ravella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Kevin Roley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Scott Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Jesse Arnett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Graham Summerlee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Lee Schneiderman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Tom Barringer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Craig Wasserman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Bill Hitchcock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Lee Brogden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Jeff Ingle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Russell Loseke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Wasserman + Lee Brogden1447% games−5.5% vs expected
Ramesh Ravella + Kevin Roley213 matchesnot enough data
Ramesh Ravella + Scott Wallace123 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Roley + Jesse Arnett213 matchesnot enough data
Tom Barringer + Lee Schneiderman123 matchesnot enough data
Scott Wallace + Jesse Arnett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ramesh Ravella
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
Kevin Roley
40W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Scott Wallace
15W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Jesse Arnett
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Graham Summerlee
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Lee Schneiderman
21W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
Tom Barringer
16W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Craig Wasserman
19W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Bill Hitchcock
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Lee Brogden
8W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Jeff Ingle
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.02
Russell Loseke
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.