Teams

SFV Mixed Nuts

SFV-Mixed 18 & Over · SFV 2021 Mixed Doubles 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.61 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-22vs SFV Herd ImmunityLost 02
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Michelle Halpern vs Rod Shimamoto / Lily Tucker6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBob Kaufman / Melissa Fonteboa vs Eric Thies / Kathrina Cruz3-6, 4-6
2021-08-15vs SFV Pure DriveWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Fonteboa / Greg Siegel vs Greg Smith / Diana Amado6-2, 7-6
L#1 DoublesVeronica Garcia / Greg Siegel vs Teri Gustafson / David Lubnow0-6, 2-6
2021-07-18vs SFV Mixed UpWon 20
W#1 DoublesVeronica Garcia / Sunny Trinh vs Kathleen Johnson / MacLyn McRae6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeepak Antony / Melissa Fonteboa vs Aldo Angrisani / Caprina Auyong6-2, 7-6
2021-07-10vs SFV Dream WeaversWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Fruits / Sunny Trinh vs James Ordway / Terri Admiraal6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 2021 Mixed Doubles 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Sunny Trinh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.78
Sebastian Carvajal
published
Delia Holguin
published 4
3.62
Melissa Fonteboa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Garen Amirganian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Lisa Bourne
published
3.52
Deepak Antony
published 4
3.45
Michelle Halpern
published
3.37
Lynne F Krueger
published
3.29
Greg Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Paul Ketrick
published
2.93
Dennis Alfelor
published 3.5
2.92
Andrea Fruits
published 3
2.65
Hrag Kopooshian
published 2.5
Veronica Garcia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garen Amirganian + Melissa Fonteboa3353% gamesnot enough data
Garen Amirganian + Michelle Halpern314 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Halpern + Greg Siegel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sunny Trinh
146W–67L career · 2 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
4.00
Sebastian Carvajal
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Delia Holguin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Melissa Fonteboa
178W–188L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Garen Amirganian
217W–148L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%40%60%
3.53
Lisa Bourne
9W–20L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Deepak Antony
4W–16L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.52
Michelle Halpern
25W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%65%35%
3.45
Lynne F Krueger
13W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Greg Siegel
173W–158L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
Paul Ketrick
9W–12L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dennis Alfelor
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
2.93
3
Andrea Fruits
15W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
2.5
Hrag Kopooshian
17W–21L career · no lines in 2021
0%12%88%
2.65
Veronica Garcia
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.