Teams

Bayliss - ACAC Mixers

2025 Charlottesville Combo Mixed · Charlottesville Combo Mixed 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-21vs Ewing- AHSLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Jupin / Stephen Smith vs Kelly Lindauer / Edward Lis3-6, 4-6
2025-09-14vs de Montbel - Smart AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephen Smith / Pamela Jupin vs Stephanie Radlick / Angel Santiago Torres3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Bayliss / Derek Frazier vs Rick Aasen / Fiona Ngo6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMatt Jones / Pamela Jupin vs Jenny Furlow / Andreas Gahlmann3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-05vs BHSC- DavisLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Zeller / Derek Frazier vs Howell Fendley / Mary Beth Cancienne4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Jupin / Zane Broden vs Mary Voelmle / Todd Hochrein0-6, 2-6
2025-08-24vs Southmayd- Farmington Two to TangoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Zeller / Derek Frazier vs Millie Cathcart / Rob Sievers5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Bayliss / Matt Jones vs Paul Given / Anne Barger6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-22vs Ewing- AHSLost 03
L#1 DoublesWilliam Manning / Pamela Jupin vs Tammy Hertel / Robert Emery6-7, 5-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Jones / Susan Bayliss vs Edward Lis / Lynette Meynig6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDoug Wampler / Melissa Zeller vs Stacy Moren / Pat BRadley1-6, 1-6
2025-08-17vs de Montbel - Smart AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDerek Frazier / Melissa Zeller vs Elena Staguhn / Ray Zuniga6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSusan Bayliss / Derek Frazier vs Andreas Gahlmann / Heather Toombs4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Jupin / Stephen Smith vs Ben Jorgensen / Stephanie Hall4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
William Manning
published
3.74
Derek Frazier
published 4
3.70
Tory Stribling
published
3.66
Stephen Smith
published
3.62
Mary Broden
published
3.34
Zane Broden
published
3.10
Melissa Zeller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Bayliss
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
2.92
Pamela Jupin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zane Broden + Mary Broden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Manning
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Derek Frazier
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
Tory Stribling
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Stephen Smith
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Mary Broden
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Zane Broden
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Melissa Zeller
121W–104L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Susan Bayliss
161W–227L career · 9 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Pamela Jupin
120W–142L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.