Teams

TNT 6.5

2023 Fredericksburg Combo Mixed · Fredericksburg Combo Mixed 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.21 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-18vs Battlefield Ball Busters 6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesBenedickte Apodaca / Joseph Yoshimura vs Tara Ford / Steven Todd6-2, 6-1
2023-11-06vs Tiebreakers 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorge Smith / Judith Jobrack vs Lorrie Roberts / Jeff Singley5-7, 3-6
2023-10-29vs Battlefield Ball Busters 6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Yoshimura / Tracey Nankivel vs Susan Button / Maurice Cornejo6-3, 7-5
2023-10-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesShadab Khan / Judith Jobrack vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-22vs Tiebreakers 6.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesDorota Sipko / Ohhwan Kim vs Barry Clark / Terry Sumner6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoseph Yoshimura / Tracey Nankivel vs Aldo Villalobos / Linda Blakemore6-2, 6-1
2023-10-21vs Battlefield Ball Busters 6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesDorota Sipko / Christopher Steed vs Robin Long / Rian Block6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Shadab Khan
published
3.53
Joseph Yoshimura
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.31
Dorota Sipko
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Carlo Gonzales
published 3.5
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.74
Jamie Mcneill
published 3
2.73
Judith Jobrack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lisa Bartley
published
Tim Drake
published
Tracey Nankivel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dorota Sipko + Joseph Yoshimura13167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shadab Khan
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Joseph Yoshimura
113W–37L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Carlo Gonzales
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Christopher Steed
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Jamie Mcneill
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Judith Jobrack
72W–90L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Lisa Bartley
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Drake
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracey Nankivel
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.