Teams

NNM 7.0M Tanoan - Goodfellow

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-10vs NNM 7.0M SV - FeliceLost 03
L#1 DoublesKris Winckler / David Idinopulos vs Terry Jackson / Ron Owen3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid King / Theodore Lowe vs Clinton Esslinger / Mikel Rowley2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Graeber / Curtis Goodfellow vs James Palmer / Dean Triplett7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2022-06-29vs NNM 7.0M TCA - TBDWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Graeber / Theodore Lowe vs Sandy McNeill / Lawrence Smith2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMike Curtis / Kris Winckler vs Peter Feibelman / David Broudy6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCurtis Goodfellow / Randy Perkins vs Douglas Cutler / Greg Fuess6-2, 6-1
2022-06-16vs NNM 7.0M JC - ChamblissSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTheodore Lowe / David Idinopulos vs LUIS SANTANA / John Loges3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMike Curtis / David Graeber vs Russell Wade / Mark Martinez7-6, 6-3
2022-06-13vs NNM 7.0M SV - FeliceLost 02
L#1 DoublesTheodore Lowe / Mike Curtis vs Ron Owen / Terry Jackson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Idinopulos / David King vs James Palmer / Bill Szaroletta6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Kris Winckler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
David Graeber
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
David Idinopulos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Marvin Jimenez
published
2.74
Curtis Goodfellow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mike Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Randy Perkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Theodore Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Curtis Goodfellow + Marvin Jimenez1733% games−9.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kris Winckler
81W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
David Graeber
30W–45L career · type M · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
David Idinopulos
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Marvin Jimenez
26W–53L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Curtis Goodfellow
22W–91L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Mike Curtis
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Randy Perkins
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Theodore Lowe
8W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.