Teams

LATA18/Hinson/LCC

18 & Over · 18 & Over LLAS - Men 5.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-14vs LLAS UPTA18A/ElstonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSean Nguyen / Matthew de Groot vs Oliver Elston / Samuel Avery6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDandaPoojith Reddy vs Evan Greer3-6, 3-6
2025-06-14vs LLAS UPTA18A/RawlingsLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew de Groot / William Wiggins vs Michael Brown / Hunter Yarborough4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDandaPoojith Reddy vs William Henderson5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJustin Downey / Nicholas Gaffos vs Nolan Marks / Toby Rawlings3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-13vs LLAS UPTA18A/KennedySplit 11
L#1 DoublesLane Hinson / Sean Nguyen vs Jadison Fioramosca / Colton Morehart0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDandaPoojith Reddy vs Ben Bertino6-4, 7-5
2025-06-13vs LCTA18/Smith/Wild DunesWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Lynch / Justin Downey vs George Clonts / Sean McNulty6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDandaPoojith Reddy vs Bryce Richards6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Wiggins / Sean Nguyen vs Donald Bruner / Dakota Greathouse7-5, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over LLAS - Men 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.47 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Lane Hinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
DandaPoojith Reddy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.64
Sean Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.34
Jamie Benefield
published 4.5
4.14
Jim Hinson
published
Justin Downey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew de Groot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nicholas Gaffos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Nguyen + Lane Hinson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lane Hinson
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
4.77
5
DandaPoojith Reddy
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean Nguyen
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.64
4.5
Jamie Benefield
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
4.34
Jim Hinson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
4.14
Justin Downey
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew de Groot
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicholas Gaffos
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.