Teams

TT: Tennis Legends

2022 Tri-Level Men · 4.5,4.0,3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-04vs Break Point TennisWon 21
L#1 DoublesEvan Haruta / Ahmed Mansour vs Shawn Holzmann / Jacek Wojtowicz3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Eng / Philippe Pultar vs Oliver Correa / Matthew Petock7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBrad Dunn / Steven Anderson vs Brian Tsai / Ross Shain6-4, 6-2
2022-11-20vs Match PointWon 21
L#1 DoublesMatt Burton / Michael Sarandon vs Christopher Muller / Matthew Anastasi2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEvan Haruta / Philippe Pultar vs Edger Bout / Philip Huggins2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteven Anderson / Daniel Eng vs Richard Birgler / Gary Davis6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-11-13vs TT - A Team Called TennisSplit 11
L#2 DoublesEvan Haruta / Philippe Pultar vs TN Thompson / Byuong Ryu6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Eng / Mark Bodnar vs Steven Erickson / Michael Hyman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-11-05vs Break Point TennisLost 02
L#1 DoublesAhmed Mansour / Evan Haruta vs Shawn Holzmann / Andrew Constant0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Anderson / Paul Mushlit vs Oliver Correa / Matthew Petock0-6, 5-7
2022-10-18vs TT - A Team Called TennisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGustavo Fantini / Matt Burton vs Bill Blake / Mat Guido2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJames Morrison / Evan Haruta vs Rains Jordan / Byuong Ryu3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-15vs Break Point TennisLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrad Dunn / Daniel Eng vs Zachary Bayman / Matthew Petock6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteven Anderson / James Morrison vs Leon Michels / Shane Zimmerman4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesGustavo Fantini / Michael Sarandon vs Shawn Holzmann / Jacek Wojtowicz6-7, 4-6
2022-10-09vs Match PointLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatt Burton / Philippe Pultar vs Andrew Greher / Matthew Anastasi4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEvan Haruta / Daniel Eng vs Darrin Villegas / Pankaj Arora1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Mushlit / Brad Dunn vs Rod Mano / Richard Birgler2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5,4.0,3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TT: Tennis Legends0761534226
2TT - A Team Called Tennis0817720210
3Match Point08121229219
4Break Point Tennis09131432241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gustavo Fantini
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.90
Philippe Pultar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Brad Dunn
published 3.5
Daniel Eng
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Paul Mushlit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Evan Haruta
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Matt Burton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evan Haruta + Philippe Pultar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gustavo Fantini
4W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Philippe Pultar
18W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
3.5
Brad Dunn
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Daniel Eng
24W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Mushlit
72W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Evan Haruta
7W–6L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matt Burton
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Anderson
16W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.