Teams

2-RGildehaus-YMCA

2022 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men-Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-05-16vs 3-KRosenkrantz-CHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesEd Holub / David Holub vs Robert Kern / James Bohanek6-3, 6-1
2022-05-11vs 1-TAikawa-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlphonso Donaldson / Edward Bernier vs Fabian Monrose / Terrence Tan5-7, 4-6
2022-04-25vs 7-JLockhead-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephen Rothchild / John Daw vs E Clarke Gay / Jerry Roberts3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEdward Bernier / Rob McKinnie vs Bruce Gitter / John Lockhead6-1, 6-1
2022-04-18vs 4-WJohnson-HSWon 10
W#1 DoublesEd Holub / David Holub vs Will Johnson / Andy Jones6-1, 6-1
2022-04-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesEdward Bernier / Lee Brooks vs Gary Sobel / Christopher Conover6-1, 7-5
2022-04-10vs 4-WJohnson-HSWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharlie Foster / Edward Bernier vs Rick Edmunds / JAMES MONTAGUE6-4, 6-2
2022-04-06vs 5-PBream-UNCLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdward Bernier / Charlie Foster vs Vincent Illiano / Michael Meyers2-6, 3-6
2022-04-04vs 1-TAikawa-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephen Rothchild / Ralph Gildehaus vs Terrence Tan / Bob Stocking2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesEdward Bernier / John Daw vs Fabian Monrose / Gary Glish4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Daw / Edward Bernier vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-08vs 7-JLockhead-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesEdward Bernier / Mark McCullough vs E Clarke Gay / Carl Laird6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-02-28vs 5-PBream-UNCLost 01
L#3 DoublesEdward Bernier / Mark McCullough vs Ted Bohlin / Michael Meyers3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Ed Holub
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Rob McKinnie
published
3.39
David Holub
published 3.5
3.30
Edward Bernier
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Stephen Rothchild
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Ralph Gildehaus
published
2.83
Ricky Ayers
published
2.69
Hayes Hofler
published 3
Alphonso Donaldson
published
John Daw
published
Justin Bryant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ed Holub + David Holub5166% games+11.5% vs expected
Ed Holub + Stephen Rothchild314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ed Holub
78W–28L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.49
Rob McKinnie
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
David Holub
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Edward Bernier
164W–76L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Stephen Rothchild
62W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Ralph Gildehaus
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Ricky Ayers
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
2.83
3
Hayes Hofler
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Alphonso Donaldson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Daw
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Justin Bryant
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.