Teams

Manor 4.0

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.70 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-02-23vs PortoLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaureen Smith / Marijane Forde vs Christina Mendelson / Jennifer Snyder3-6, 3-6
2023-02-10vs KorolkoffLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarijane Forde / Sherifa Fahmy vs Danielle Woo / Mary Papadopulos3-6, 3-6
2023-01-18vs WesleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesCammie Condell / Marijane Forde vs Kate Wesley / Emma Shine3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Pamela Hjelle
published
3.73
Sherri Dixon
published
3.69
Anne Pyne
published 4
3.63
3.54
Cammie Condell
published 3.5
3.51
Deborah Vazzana
published
3.49
Lisa Hanagan
published
3.49
Kelley Donellan
published
3.44
Melisssa Hacopian
published
3.29
Marijane Forde
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.24
Amy Burgoyne
published 3.5
3.23
Maureen Smith
published
Laura MECHAK
published
Sarah Albus
published
Sherifa Fahmy
published
Susan Quirk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Burgoyne + Cammie Condell224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Quirk + Lisa Hanagan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Hjelle
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
Sherri Dixon
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Anne Pyne
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Cathy Ventrell-Monsees
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Cammie Condell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
Deborah Vazzana
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Lisa Hanagan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Kelley Donellan
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Melisssa Hacopian
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Marijane Forde
36W–43L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Amy Burgoyne
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Maureen Smith
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Laura MECHAK
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Albus
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherifa Fahmy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Quirk
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.