Teams

GS-Humphrey

2022 Adult 40 & Over FALL Night League -GS · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Francis Samios
published 4
3.52
Jana Porter
published
3.31
Aurelia Tucker
published 3.5
3.29
Farrah Keel
published 4
3.28
Pam Sparks
published
3.26
Cheryl Jordan
published 3.5
3.15
Patricia Hughston
published
3.15
Kim Humphrey
published
3.13
Michelle Greene
published
Kathleen Browne
published
Kelli Lovoy
published
Polly Armstrong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aurelia Tucker + Kim Humphrey2353% games+9.9% vs expected
Pam Sparks + Michelle Greene7359% games+6.7% vs expected
Cheryl Jordan + Patricia Hughston61048% games−4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Francis Samios
22W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Jana Porter
24W–19L career · no lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Aurelia Tucker
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
4
Farrah Keel
7W–36L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.29
Pam Sparks
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cheryl Jordan
28W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Patricia Hughston
12W–22L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Kim Humphrey
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Michelle Greene
19W–7L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Kathleen Browne
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelli Lovoy
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Polly Armstrong
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.