Teams

OSB:Prosecco Girls:Goletz/Coffey

2024 ECT Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 Women Flt 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-08vs MIS:40& 3.5 W:Burke/NolanLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Caldwell / Susan Potter vs Lisa Marie Coleman / Mia Nolan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Schumann / Rebecca Coffey vs Patricia Conway / Amy Baumann2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDennise Antonio / Megan Collins vs Eileen Cosgriff / Lauri Burke7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesNancy Schumann / Rebecca Coffey vs Jennifer Brant / Carolyn Agee0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Goletz vs Michelle Belcourt2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Moran / Cherie Anderson-Mucha vs Juliette Fumex / Jacqui Mullally4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMolly Franke / Dennise Antonio vs Krista Fay / Alison Wehrle1-6, 0-6
2024-05-11vs OSB:40& 3.5 W:LibertSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNancy Schumann / Mary Ann Moran vs Valerie Libert / MaryBeth Giles6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPhilippa Mannino / Cherie Anderson-Mucha vs Cathleen Carroll / Eileen Duggan5-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesPhilippa Mannino / Rebecca Coffey vs Catherine Dinauer / Kate Piironen6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Goletz vs Marissa Capasso6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Eastwood / Nancy Schumann vs Kristen Rosecrans / Debbie Kelly6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCherie Anderson-Mucha / Mary Ann Moran vs Emily Ingham / Mary Glidden6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesBeverly Costello / Susan Potter vs Liesl Purviance / Laura King3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCherie Anderson-Mucha / Carolyn Caldwell vs Jamie Stasko / Monica Slowik6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRebecca Coffey / Nancy Schumann vs Sarah du Plessis / Jeanne Consiglio6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-03vs LS:DeMatteo's Divas:DeMatteoLost 04
L#1 DoublesCherie Anderson-Mucha / Carolyn Caldwell vs Lisa Belliveau / Donna Sullivan1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMegan Collins vs Martha Gibson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Eastwood / Nancy Schumann vs Carla Darista / Roisin MacKey4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDennise Antonio / Svetlana Goletz vs Kim de Matteo / Anne Luner4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 Women Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MAD:Madrackets 3.5 W:Goldfeder/Palmer0619514158
2LS:DeMatteo's Divas:DeMatteo0617718190
3OSB:40& 3.5 W:Libert0614920195
4GF:Namaste at the Net:Rosecrans/LaCascia-Ehlert06101126229
5MIL:Ladies of the Court:Wall/Orban0671534249
6OSB:Prosecco Girls:Goletz/Coffey0671736253
7MIS:40& 3.5 W:Burke/Nolan0661839260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Philippa Mannino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Svetlana Goletz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Nancy Eastwood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Beverly Costello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Cherie Anderson-Mucha
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.12
Mary Ann Moran
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Carolyn Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Nancy Schumann
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.94
Megan Collins
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.85
Rebecca Coffey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Dennise Antonio
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Samantha McDowell
published
Susan Potter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennise Antonio + Samantha McDowell5252% games+9.7% vs expected
Mary Ann Moran + Nancy Schumann3353% games+8.5% vs expected
Beverly Costello + Carolyn Caldwell8555% games+7.1% vs expected
Beverly Costello + Philippa Mannino271852% games+5.2% vs expected
Rebecca Coffey + Philippa Mannino5849% games+5.0% vs expected
Nancy Eastwood + Nancy Schumann12756% games+3.8% vs expected
Susan Potter + Nancy Schumann9263% games+3.6% vs expected
Susan Potter + Beverly Costello14358% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philippa Mannino
66W–69L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.41
Svetlana Goletz
49W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Nancy Eastwood
22W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Beverly Costello
82W–87L career · 1 line in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Cherie Anderson-Mucha
21W–39L career · 7 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Mary Ann Moran
47W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Carolyn Caldwell
55W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
Nancy Schumann
85W–93L career · 7 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Megan Collins
20W–29L career · 7 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.94
Rebecca Coffey
59W–88L career · 4 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Dennise Antonio
51W–61L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Samantha McDowell
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Potter
42W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.