Teams

NNM/Friedman/55 & Over/8.0M

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over League - NNM · 8.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-20vs NNM 8.0M SFTS - BarkerWon 20
W#1 DoublesRick McCormick / David Mirabal vs Vahl Jackson / Jon Bloodworth6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMark Friedman / Ron Samples vs Jeffrey Pine / Paul Tachau6-3, 6-2
2023-05-12vs NNM 8.0M ELG - MartinWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatrick Sullivan / Bernie Brandon vs Michael Fugate / Roger Prucino6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRon Samples / Mark Friedman vs Peter Martin / Stephen Post6-3, 6-2
2023-05-09vs NNM 8.0M LOBO - HwangWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Friedman / Rick McCormick vs Robert Hwang / Duke Dow6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMike Rising / Jud Lee vs Ralph Tissot / Jeff Tsao6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMario Moreno / Scott Hulick vs Alan Zampini / Leon Redman6-3, 6-4
2023-04-29vs NNM 8.0M JC - MinWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatrick Sullivan / Bernie Brandon vs Jae Lee / Alan Blair6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRick McCormick / David Mirabal vs Yongseek Kim / Joey Pollom7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMark Friedman / Ron Samples vs Hyeung-Sik Jason Min / David Walsh6-0, 6-4
2023-04-29vs NNM 8.0M JC - MinWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatrick Sullivan / Bernie Brandon vs Yongseek Kim / Shane Sasser6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRick McCormick / David Mirabal vs Hyeung-Sik Jason Min / Michael Kent6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Friedman / Ron Samples vs Jae Lee / Joey Pollom6-4, 6-2
2023-04-21vs NNM 8.0M HP - MartelloSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRick McCormick / David Mirabal vs Tom Weeks / Daniel Stephens6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Rising / Jud Lee vs Ty Martello / Roy McKinney5-7, 3-6
2023-04-17vs NNM 8.0M VR - CharrlinWon 30
W#1 DoublesRick McCormick / David Mirabal vs Stephen Madeyski / Donn Calder6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRon Samples / Daniel McClanahan vs Keith Kollarik / Bob Gonzalez7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMario Moreno / Scott Hulick vs Marck Wright / Douglas Oltmans6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-07vs NNM 8.0M SFTS - BarkerWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatrick Sullivan / Rick McCormick vs Paul Black / Jeffrey Pine6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBernie Brandon / David Mirabal vs Brian Crozier / Tony Rogers6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRon Samples / Mark Friedman vs Matthew Barker / Ted Samples6-2, 6-3
2023-03-31vs NNM 8.0M ELG - MartinWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatrick Sullivan / Rick McCormick vs Paul Wantuck / Dennis Marker6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMark Friedman / Jud Lee vs Peter Martin / Robert Johnston6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-30vs NNM 8.0M HP - MartelloLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Friedman / Mike Rising vs Mark Wallenbrock / Ty Martello1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBernie Brandon / Patrick Sullivan vs Tom Weeks / Tom Arnold6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel McClanahan / Jud Lee vs Tim Sander / Scott Jamison1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Friedman/55 & Over/8.0M8122514194
2NNM 8.0M JC - Min63151227231
3NNM 8.0M HP - Martello53141023206
4NNM 8.0M VR - Charrlin36111636274
5NNM 8.0M ELG - Martin225717125
6NNM 8.0M SFTS - Barker2691533238
7NNM 8.0M LOBO - Hwang2781944294

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Scott Hulick
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Bernie Brandon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Rick McCormick
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.71
Ron Samples
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
David Mirabal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Mario Moreno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Daniel McClanahan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jud Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mike Rising
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Patrick Sullivan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Rising + Daniel McClanahan3339% games−15.0% vs expected
David Mirabal + Rick McCormick5252% gamesnot enough data
Ron Samples + Patrick Sullivan4163% gamesnot enough data
Scott Hulick + Mario Moreno404 matchesnot enough data
Mario Moreno + Ron Samples404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Hulick
80W–57L career · 6 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Bernie Brandon
60W–31L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Rick McCormick
124W–73L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Ron Samples
154W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
4
David Mirabal
29W–30L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Mario Moreno
63W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Daniel McClanahan
78W–105L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jud Lee
3W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Rising
36W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patrick Sullivan
62W–39L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.