Teams

Segrist 18+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-15Won 10
W#2 SinglesSandy Segrist vs Riti Gupta6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesSandy Segrist vs Thi Nguyen6-4, 6-4
2022-06-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesSandy Segrist vs Holly M Beck6-0, 6-4
2022-05-25vs Players Are Ready 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesDionne Miller / Sandy Segrist vs Sung Cho / Caroline Vantiem6-2, 6-2
2022-05-21vs Net Assets 18+Won 10
W#1 SinglesSandy Segrist vs Kathryn Poehler6-4, 6-4
2022-05-07vs Casual Sets 18+Won 10
W#1 SinglesSandy Segrist vs Elizabeth McLeod6-2, 6-1
2022-05-01vs Sparks 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Garofalo / Sandy Segrist vs Lisa Paulman / Donna Slaughter3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-23vs Smashed 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMaggie Christian / Suzanne Arena vs Amy Kluckhuhn / Katie Wolven3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-12vs Sets in the City 18+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Arena / Kimberly Stepherson vs Brooke Davidson / Kimberly Ford1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Sandy Segrist
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.08
Kimberly Stepherson
published
3.06
Sandy Friedman
published
2.92
Suzanne Arena
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.92
Jennifer Nazaire
published
2.81
Donna Saia
published 3
Sherin Shahegh
published
Valerie Hicks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Saia + Suzanne Arena213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sandy Segrist
116W–94L career · 7 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Kimberly Stepherson
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Sandy Friedman
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Suzanne Arena
93W–109L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jennifer Nazaire
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Donna Saia
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.81
Sherin Shahegh
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Valerie Hicks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.