Teams

RJSPensler/Barber Jetton

2022-2023 Racquets & Jackets Doubles League · Women Division C (2.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-02-11vs RJPBochey/JettonWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Fogel / Norma Zitnik vs Patricia Bochey / Christine Miles6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDebra Haines / Natalie Hallman vs Gwen Petrasko / Erin Pickens1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-04vs RJSSchneider/NMPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Fogel / Julia Mueller vs Brooke Francis / Sylvia Sullivan2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSayra Brynn / Natalie Hallman vs Susan Bolger / Kelli Rester7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-01-28vs RJKNardone/JettonLost 12
L#1 DoublesNorma Zitnik / Julia Mueller vs Megan Hartley / Lisa Levy2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Fowler / Denise Takes vs Tammy Cline / Danielle Mikolajczyk6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Davis / Natalie Hallman vs Suzy Wright / Karen Adams6-4, 6-1
2023-01-14vs RJDFiore/WestportWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Mueller / Dawn Bush vs Tanner Jordan / Nathalie Naslund6-2, 6-4
2023-01-07vs RJPBochey/JettonLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Davis / Sayra Brynn vs Gina van Nortwick / Chelsea Petrasko6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-12-17vs RJSSchneider/NMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrenda Kadlecik / Danielle Fowler vs Leslie Shaw / Samantha Schneider6-2, 6-3
2022-12-10vs RJKNardone/JettonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDawn Bush / Julia Mueller vs Megan Hartley / Lisa Levy2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSayra Brynn / Natalie Hallman vs Callie Dobbins / Suzy Wright6-2, 6-4
2022-11-19vs RJDFiore/WestportWon 21
L#1 DoublesNorma Zitnik / Julia Mueller vs Tanner Jordan / Katelyn Goodnough1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Fowler / Sheila Pensler vs Catherine Wulfhorst / Mary Clare Hainsworth6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebra Haines / Sayra Brynn vs Carrie Davin / JoAnna Kauffman6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Division C (2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Dawn Bush
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Sayra Brynn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Danielle Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.20
Bethany Barber
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.17
Norma Zitnik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Sheila Pensler
published
3.08
Julia Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Brenda Kadlecik
published 3
2.82
Denise Takes
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.36
Natalie Hallman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Linda Fogel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Mueller + Denise Takes31140% games−11.2% vs expected
Denise Takes + Bethany Barber6555% gamesnot enough data
Denise Takes + Brenda Kadlecik1938% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Kadlecik + Bethany Barber5549% gamesnot enough data
Julia Mueller + Norma Zitnik134 matchesnot enough data
Julia Mueller + Brenda Kadlecik134 matchesnot enough data
Denise Takes + Sheila Pensler033 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Pensler + Brenda Kadlecik123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Bush
50W–40L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Sayra Brynn
74W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3
Danielle Fowler
120W–72L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.21
3.5
Bethany Barber
136W–117L career · 7 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Norma Zitnik
131W–136L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Sheila Pensler
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Julia Mueller
93W–161L career · 5 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Brenda Kadlecik
41W–69L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Denise Takes
125W–152L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
2.5
Natalie Hallman
57W–78L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%84%16%
2.36
Linda Fogel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.