Teams

2 WW Thundercats - Raymond

2025 Richmond Tri-Level Mixed · Richmond Tri-Level Mixed 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-06vs 6 Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Baker / Jacob Dyer vs LaVera Williams / Andrew Zima6-4, 7-6
2025-10-30vs 7 MTC CousineauSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKory Painter / Michelle Baker vs Fahim Rahman / Olena Turner4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Baker / Kacie Painter vs Rafael Garrido / Jennifer Shaffer6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-02vs 6 Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Baker / Sean DiBlasi vs Laurent Beausergent / Daniela Otto7-6, 2-1
2025-09-26vs 1 MAC HambrickLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Diller / Jacob Dyer vs Katie Hambrick / Zach Pettit1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKacie Painter / James Mullahy vs Erich Yost / Susan Greenspoon4-6, 3-6
2025-09-25vs 4 Avalon MizrachLost 01
L#1 DoublesKory Painter / Michelle Baker vs Lesley Terminella / Zachary Walton7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Mixed 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Jessica Hupe
published
3.82
Kory Painter
published
3.82
Emma Moredock
published
3.78
Jacob Dyer
published
3.75
Elizabeth Diller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Michelle Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Sean DiBlasi
published
3.59
Rina Dyer
published
3.54
Kacie Painter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Procter Fishburne
published
3.38
Jessica Parrent
published
3.37
James Mullahy
published
3.19
JJ Thompson
published
3.00
Emilie Raymond
published
2.94
Craig Dober
published 3
2.72
Stephen Demella
published
Lauren King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Mullahy + Jessica Parrent404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Hupe
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.85
Kory Painter
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Emma Moredock
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Jacob Dyer
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Elizabeth Diller
86W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Michelle Baker
149W–82L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Sean DiBlasi
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Rina Dyer
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Kacie Painter
196W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Procter Fishburne
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Jessica Parrent
27W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
James Mullahy
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
JJ Thompson
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Emilie Raymond
29W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Craig Dober
27W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Stephen Demella
23W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Lauren King
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.