Teams

Morris 40+ 2.5

2023 Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-27vs Lucky in Love 40+ 2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesEllen Buckley / Sara Batouli vs Kimberlee Schulden / Dawn Macey-Boyette6-3, 6-3
2023-07-18vs Lucky in Love 40+ 2.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSara Batouli vs Grace Tran0-6, 0-6
2023-07-09vs Lucky in Love 40+ 2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesBetsy Morris / Andrea Smolen vs Kimberlee Schulden / Miyeon Jeon6-2, 7-5
2023-06-20vs Lucky in Love 40+ 2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Harrell / Andrea Smolen vs Grace Tran / Miyeon Jeon6-0, 6-1
2023-05-18vs Lucky in Love 40+ 2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Robertson / Andrea Smolen vs Roshni Fifadra / Tannan Hagyard1-6, 2-6
2023-05-08vs Lucky in Love 40+ 2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesAndrea Smolen / Stephanie Baker vs Kimberlee Schulden / Roshni Fifadra6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSara Batouli vs Grace Tran0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
DONALD CRAWLEY
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
2.77
Ellen Buckley
published
2.76
Andrea Smolen
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Seema Iyer
published
2.53
Linda Harrell
published
2.51
Sara Batouli
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.32
Betsy Morris
published 2.5
2.20
Stephanie Baker
published
2.04
Courtney Robertson
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seema Iyer + Stephanie Baker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
DONALD CRAWLEY
472W–252L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
Ellen Buckley
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Andrea Smolen
170W–218L career · 12 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
2.76
Seema Iyer
3W–16L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Linda Harrell
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Sara Batouli
26W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%46%54%
2.51
2.5
Betsy Morris
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.32
Stephanie Baker
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.20
2.5
Courtney Robertson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.