Teams

Pautsch/Bella Vista/Reb

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-29vs Sawyer/Wilmar/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Droke / Tim Sullivan vs Jimmy Sawyer / John Wright0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHal Fincher / Rickard Hood vs Johnny Hibbs / Steve Welch6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Pautsch / John Ragni vs Chris Benson / Bob Manry5-7, 4-6
2024-09-28vs Dudley/Cole/Jonesboro/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Pautsch / Robert Droke vs Thomas Fridell / Rob Veach4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Tiernan / Tim Sullivan vs Steve Hardgrave / Steve Vaughn0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJack Kern / John Ragni vs Andrew Nadzam / John Shellenberger2-6, 5-7
2024-09-28vs Sawyer/Wilmar/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesJack Kern / John Ragni vs Johnny Hibbs / Steve Welch2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTim Sullivan / Steve Tiernan vs Jimmy Sawyer / John Wright2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRickard Hood / Hal Fincher vs Chris Benson / Bob Manry4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-09-27vs Dudley/Cole/Jonesboro/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaul Pautsch / Robert Droke vs Steve Hardgrave / Steve Vaughn0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHal Fincher / Rickard Hood vs Thomas Fridell / Mike Slabaugh6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJack Kern / Steve Tiernan vs Andrew Nadzam / John Shellenberger2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jack Kern
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Robert Droke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Paul Pautsch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Rickard Hood
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Hal Fincher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
John Ragni
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Tiernan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hal Fincher + Rickard Hood213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jack Kern
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
Robert Droke
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Paul Pautsch
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Rickard Hood
29W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.40
Hal Fincher
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Ragni
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Tiernan
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.