Teams

Shipyard Super Shots

Adult Team Tennis · Team Tennis

26 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Team Tennis have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Paige Cummings
published
3.76
Heather Galvin
published
Anthony Bensch
published 4
3.31
Ingrid Skipper
published
3.26
Ann Katoh
published 3.5
Connie Becker
published 3.5
3.22
Matthew Haschak
published
3.21
Doyle Long
published
3.18
Feliz Steele
published
3.14
Patrick Cummings
published
3.11
Tracy Sklarin
published
3.10
3.09
Cinda Oehlke
published 3.5
3.05
Sophie Vigeant
published
3.04
Gwen Sanders
published
3.04
Mary Howe
published
2.97
Justin Cheesman
published
2.94
Helene Braun
published
2.93
Lori Vargo
published
2.91
Drew Oehlke
published
2.72
Cindy House
published 3
2.69
Felicia Neczypor
published
Hanne McNutt
published
Kevin Richard
published
Steve House
published
Tracy Kelly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Katoh + Ingrid Skipper7161% games+15.0% vs expected
Cindy House + Gwen Sanders2352% games−0.0% vs expected
Feliz Steele + Connie Becker033 matchesnot enough data
Gwen Sanders + Connie Becker213 matchesnot enough data
Sophie Vigeant + Felicia Neczypor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Cummings
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
Heather Galvin
24W–11L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.76
4
Anthony Bensch
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ingrid Skipper
67W–40L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Ann Katoh
35W–31L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Connie Becker
34W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Haschak
82W–33L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Doyle Long
7W–20L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Feliz Steele
34W–26L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Patrick Cummings
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Tracy Sklarin
16W–19L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Doreen Miller-Richard
7W–21L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cinda Oehlke
57W–34L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Sophie Vigeant
31W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Gwen Sanders
81W–40L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.04
Mary Howe
24W–38L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Justin Cheesman
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Helene Braun
44W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Lori Vargo
39W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Drew Oehlke
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
3
Cindy House
39W–24L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Felicia Neczypor
62W–64L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Hanne McNutt
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Richard
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve House
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Kelly
12W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.