Teams

Fee - Prior

2025 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Spring · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-21vs Kiwi - BurkeWon 20
W#1 DoublesCourtney McCaleb / Inez Prior vs Summer Moses / Anne Burns6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMadeline Calise / Anna van Staagen vs Emily Burke / Tera Schroeder6-2, 6-2
2025-04-30vs Brevard/Woods/18&Over2.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesCourtney McCaleb / Anna van Staagen vs Eileen Bentley / Anna Marie Pippett6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMadeline Calise / Nicole Kendrick vs Joanne Ludwig / Cheryl Toth1-6, 0-6
2025-04-16vs Kiwi - BurkeLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Kendrick / Margaret Kendrick vs Anne Burns / Edna Chism0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesCourtney McCaleb vs Summer Moses7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHanh Pham / Madeline Calise vs Dana Chesser / Tera Schroeder3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.38
Inez Prior
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Courtney McCaleb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Anna van Staagen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.04
Natalie Happ
published
2.02
Nicole Kendrick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.98
Margaret Kendrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.88
Madeline Calise
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Cuddeback
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Kendrick + Madeline Calise033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Inez Prior
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Courtney McCaleb
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Anna van Staagen
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Happ
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Nicole Kendrick
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Margaret Kendrick
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Madeline Calise
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Michele Schwartzseid
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Cuddeback
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.