Teams

HOAWC/McClain/65&over6.0W

2026 HOA Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 6.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-22vs Elving, BeverlyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Viviano / Janet Crawford vs Carolyn Frazier / Elizabeth Barnes4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Cronkhite / Diane Phillips vs Pam Dunaway / Beverly Elving3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJUDY STAROSCIK / Cindy Kochersperger vs Donetta Shaner / Teresa Riggins6-2, 4-5, 0-1
2026-05-08vs HOA/Robertson/65&over6.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Cronkhite / Diane Phillips vs Connie Johnson / Chris Westermajer6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanet Crawford / Megan Viviano vs Diane Freeman / Kay Turman7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCindy Kochersperger / Lucretia Raby vs Carol Levalley / Marcia Robertson6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-01vs Elving, BeverlyWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarb Ginavan / Susan Winn vs Elizabeth Barnes / Carolyn Frazier2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Cronkhite / Diane Phillips vs Beverly Elving / Pam Dunaway6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJody McClain / Megan Viviano vs Teresa Riggins / Cathy Czir6-1, 6-4
2026-04-17vs HOA/Robertson/65&over6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Winn / Imelda Tooey vs Monica Levens / Donna Turnbull2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Cronkhite / Diane Phillips vs Diane Freeman / Maryanne Loscalzo6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Crawford / Cindy Kochersperger vs Kay Turman / Marcia Robertson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Robertson/65&over6.0W318411103
2HOAWC/McClain/65&over6.0W226615109

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Diane Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Imelda Tooey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Janet Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.80
Cindy Kochersperger
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Lucretia Raby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Barb Ginavan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Megan Viviano
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Jody McClain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Ann Cronkhite
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
JUDY STAROSCIK
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Julie Fuller
published
Susan Winn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Cronkhite + Diane Phillips4256% games+0.6% vs expected
Barb Ginavan + Imelda Tooey2648% games−1.4% vs expected
Janet Crawford + Cindy Kochersperger41837% games−4.9% vs expected
Julie Fuller + Ann Cronkhite2340% games−6.6% vs expected
Cindy Kochersperger + Imelda Tooey2936% games−8.4% vs expected
Susan Winn + Barb Ginavan2839% games−9.5% vs expected
Janet Crawford + Megan Viviano3348% gamesnot enough data
Jody McClain + Ann Cronkhite2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Phillips
31W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Imelda Tooey
19W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Janet Crawford
59W–74L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Cindy Kochersperger
28W–90L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Lucretia Raby
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Barb Ginavan
19W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Megan Viviano
59W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Jody McClain
30W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Ann Cronkhite
46W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
JUDY STAROSCIK
25W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Julie Fuller
26W–83L career · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44
Susan Winn
8W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.