Teams

Bulnes - Salina

2024 KS 18 & Over Adult Indoor League · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
L#1 DoublesLindsey Sandquist / Maria Cheney vs Danielle Kruse / Jodi Blair4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSadie Roesner / Mayela Campa vs Christina Wiens / Hope Bright2-6, 2-6
2024-04-06vs KS/Kruse-Thoele/Caudill/18&Over2.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLindsey Sandquist / Sadie Roesner vs Danielle Kruse / Hope Bright6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaria Cheney / Mayela Campa vs Christina Wiens / Jodi Blair2-6, 0-6
2024-03-23vs Greene/McCoy - WichitaWon 21
W#1 DoublesCathy Hayes / Lesa Dunn vs Rosanne Greene / Miriam Saad6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMayela Campa vs Paula Bette0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSadie Roesner / Maria Cheney vs Nikki McCoy / Melissa Mangan6-4, 6-2
2024-03-23vs Greene/McCoy - WichitaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLesa Dunn / Maria Cheney vs Miriam Saad / Paula Bette0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Hayes / Mayela Campa vs Margo Parks / Katie Gann7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLindsey Sandquist / Maria Cheney vs Deanna Putnam / Sadie Millard6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSadie Roesner vs NOURA ABBAS6-2, 2-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLesa Dunn / Petey Eshleman vs Kim Ritchie / Lauren Glisson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLesa Dunn / Petey Eshleman vs Lauren Glisson / Erica Combs4-6, 1-5
W#1 SinglesLindsey Sandquist vs Deanna Putnam6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSadie Roesner / Mayela Campa vs Charissa Evans / Ann Staples6-2, 5-2
2024-02-11vs Greene/McCoy - WichitaWon 21
W#1 DoublesSadie Roesner / Cathy Hayes vs Rosanne Greene / Paula Bette6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRenae Frost vs Miriam Saad3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLindsey Sandquist / Maria Cheney vs Margo Parks / Andrea Baalmann6-1, 6-4
2024-02-11vs Greene/McCoy - WichitaWon 21
W#1 DoublesRenae Frost / Cathy Hayes vs Nikki McCoy / Erin Goward6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLindsey Sandquist vs Amanda Moreira3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSadie Roesner / Mayela Campa vs Nancy Graber / Melissa Mangan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCathy Hayes / Lindsey Sandquist vs Kareem Thomas / ShaNoah Emory1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRenae Frost vs Amanda Ross3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMayela Campa / Sadie Roesner vs Danielle Kruse / Michelle Schulte2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesLindsey Sandquist / Mayela Campa vs Amanda Ross / Jayme Carpenter1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSadie Roesner vs Christina Wiens6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCathy Hayes / Renae Frost vs Kareem Thomas / Michelle Schulte6-0, 6-4
L#1 DoublesCathy Hayes / Renae Frost vs Kim Ritchie / Lauren Glisson2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMaureen Riordan vs Sadie Millard0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSadie Roesner / Mayela Campa vs Charissa Evans / LewJene Schneider7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesCathy Hayes / Sadie Roesner vs Kim Ritchie / Sadie Millard6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRenae Frost vs Charissa Evans6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaureen Riordan / Mayela Campa vs Lauren Glisson / LewJene Schneider2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ritchie/Vennavelli - Wichita75211534250
2Bulnes - Salina57152147338
3Vennavelli - Genesis Rock Road, Winter Team 1000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cathy Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Renae Frost
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lesa Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lindsey Sandquist
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Maria Cheney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Maureen Riordan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mayela Campa
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 10% · published
Petey Eshleman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rafael Bulnes
published
Sadie Roesner
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sadie Roesner + Mayela Campa2345% games−5.5% vs expected
Renae Frost + Cathy Hayes213 matchesnot enough data
Maria Cheney + Lindsey Sandquist213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cathy Hayes
6W–2L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Renae Frost
36W–65L career · 6 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
Lesa Dunn
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsey Sandquist
4W–4L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Cheney
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Riordan
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mayela Campa
3W–11L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Petey Eshleman
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rafael Bulnes
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sadie Roesner
15W–7L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.