Teams

Bako - LLW - Team Holliday

2026 Adult 55 & Over - Bakersfield · 7.0 Women - Bake

14 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-08vs Bako - Team MunnSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNahla Tamer / Linette Holliday vs Colleen Paulden / KIMBERLY PFISTER6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDiane Bashirtash / Terry Echeverria vs Rebecca Badgett / Jeannie Munn7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-01vs Bako - Team MunnWon 20
W#1 DoublesAgnes DeJong / Michelle Pisano vs Luann Shults / Denise Duquette7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Meger / Marri Tillema vs Cindy Seibly / Beverly Wetterholm6-1, 6-4
2026-02-22vs Bako - Team MunnWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Drake / Marri Tillema vs Jeannie Munn / Deborah Clark6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Meger / Minda Owens vs KIMBERLY PFISTER / Colleen Paulden6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Maier / Michelle Pisano vs Sandra Gamboa / Leah Coughlin6-4, 6-3
2026-02-08vs Bako - Team MunnWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Meger / Marri Tillema vs Luann Shults / Denise Duquette6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Drake / Minda Owens vs Jeannie Munn / KIMBERLY PFISTER7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKori Harrison / Carol Maier vs Sandra Gamboa / Colleen Paulden6-4, 6-3
2026-02-01vs Bako - Team MunnLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarol Maier / Michelle Pisano vs Colleen Paulden / KIMBERLY PFISTER6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCindy Goodmon / Agnes DeJong vs Leah Coughlin / Cindy Seibly1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarri Tillema / Minda Owens vs Jeannie Munn / Beverly Wetterholm3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-27vs Bako - Team MunnSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrooke Drake / Minda Owens vs Deborah Clark / Beverly Wetterholm5-7, 0-2
W#2 DoublesDiane Bashirtash / Nahla Tamer vs Maureen Andrew / Luann Shults3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-25vs Bako - Team MunnWon 20
W#1 DoublesAgnes DeJong / Kori Harrison vs Rebecca Badgett / Sandra Gamboa6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLinette Holliday / Carol Maier vs Cindy Seibly / Maureen Andrew6-3, 6-4
2026-01-11vs Bako - Team MunnLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Pisano / Carol Maier vs KIMBERLY PFISTER / Colleen Paulden2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAgnes DeJong / Minda Owens vs Rebecca Badgett / Mary Wilkening4-6, 4-6
2026-01-04vs Bako - Team MunnWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarri Tillema / Amy Meger vs Deborah Clark / Imelda Ceja-Butkiewicz6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Pisano / Carol Maier vs KIMBERLY PFISTER / Beverly Wetterholm6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAgnes DeJong / Kori Harrison vs Jeannie Munn / Rebecca Badgett6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Women - Bake
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bako - LLW - Team Holliday63161124224
2Bako - Team Munn36111636244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Amy Meger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Brooke Drake
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Carol Maier
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Kori Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Linette Holliday
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Diane Bashirtash
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Agnes DeJong
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Michelle Pisano
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.03
Nahla Tamer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Marri Tillema
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.87
Cindy Goodmon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Minda Owens
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Gioconda Erquiaga
published
Terry Echeverria
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marri Tillema + Minda Owens101253% games+10.4% vs expected
Carol Maier + Michelle Pisano314 matchesnot enough data
Marri Tillema + Amy Meger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Meger
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42
4
Brooke Drake
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Carol Maier
5W–1L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Kori Harrison
19W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Linette Holliday
118W–107L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Diane Bashirtash
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Agnes DeJong
12W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Michelle Pisano
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Nahla Tamer
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Marri Tillema
49W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Cindy Goodmon
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Minda Owens
39W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Gioconda Erquiaga
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Terry Echeverria
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.