Teams

NRS - Wells/Brimlow

2022 IRMSL Adult 55 & Over · 8.0- Women -Sa

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-19vs Buttonwood - MaddenWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Wigley / Mary Murray vs Lori Glaspey / Bonnie Robinson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBarbara Wells / Susan Gore vs Lana Heinze / Anita Venner4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Fulper / Sue Davis vs Catherine Spahr / Julie Hofmeister7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-02-05vs Buttonwood - MaddenLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Fulper / Barbara Wells vs Marguerite Madden / Sandra Chapin2-6, 3-6
2022-01-29vs Buttonwood - MaddenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Wigley / Susan Gore vs Marguerite Madden / Sandra Chapin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJerri Brennan / Rebecca Fulper vs Nancy Alvarez / Penny Boulden1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesMary Murray / Susan Gore vs Anne Muren / Marta Gannon6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRebecca Fulper / Barbara Wells vs Lorraine Paxson / Catherine Spahr6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0- Women -Sa have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Carolyn Strong
published 4
3.66
Grace Pillari
published 4
3.62
Susan Gore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Renee' Palmer
published
3.31
Jerri Brennan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Elizabeth Froehling
published 3.5
Lisa Wigley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Murray
published
Patricia Brimlow
published
Rebecca Fulper
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Simone Meiseles
published
Sue Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Gore + Carolyn Strong14553% games−3.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Froehling + Jerri Brennan4160% gamesnot enough data
Susan Gore + Lisa Wigley314 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Fulper + Carolyn Strong314 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Fulper + Lisa Wigley213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Fulper + Renee' Palmer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Strong
131W–68L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Grace Pillari
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Susan Gore
58W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Renee' Palmer
64W–70L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
Jerri Brennan
57W–70L career · 1 line in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Elizabeth Froehling
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Lisa Wigley
39W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Murray
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Brimlow
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Fulper
61W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Simone Meiseles
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Davis
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.