Teams

TOC.Byrd

2025 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-25vs TOC.PerianWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Sergii Porokh7-6, 6-1
2025-08-18Won 10
W#3 SinglesZachariah Anderson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-04vs TOC.JavalkarSplit 11
W#1 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Cecil Turner7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Kyler Zadell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-28vs LOCH.GloerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Wes Watson6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Andreas Combos2-6, 4-6
2025-07-11Won 10
W#2 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Ryan Lewis6-3, 6-2
2025-07-07vs TOC.SaykoWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Ryan Sayko7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Anil Chawla7-5, 6-0
2025-06-23vs MCP.HanauerWon 20
W#2 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Kelvin Menezes6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Daniel Gallo6-4, 6-1
2025-06-17vs TOC.PerianWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Sergii Porokh6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Herman Gudjonson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.47
Zachariah Anderson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.43
Brett Eckles
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.31
Richard Papantonis
published
4.28
Brian Song
published 4.5
4.15
Beomjun Ju
published 4.5
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Yihui Chen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Eckles + Herman Gudjonson6262% games+2.4% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Herman Gudjonson161257% games−5.0% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Brett Eckles3255% gamesnot enough data
Zachariah Anderson + Brett Eckles3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Herman Gudjonson
115W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.54
4.5
Zachariah Anderson
71W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
4.47
4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
Richard Papantonis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Brian Song
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Beomjun Ju
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
Yihui Chen
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.