Teams

Sweet Sets-Ward

2025 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-06-15Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMaren Ward vs Susan Tracy1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-11vs BHSC The Slice Girls-KeenerWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaren Ward / Michelle Ruiz vs Susie Jones / Susan Park6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMargie Halinski / Blair Hubbard vs Laura Pietro / Wendi Ruschmann6-1, 7-6
2025-06-02vs ACAC Game Changers-BarrettSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Ruiz / Maren Ward vs Christina Meyer / Stephanie Lewandowski7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBlair Hubbard / Elizabeth Beasley vs Saundra Barrett / Samantha Bates4-6, 3-6
2025-05-12vs BHSC The Fun Bunch-McCullochLost 02
L#1 DoublesBlair Hubbard / Leah Burger vs Shannon Henderson / Faith Zabek1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMaren Ward vs Stephanie Marcus1-6, 3-6
2025-05-07vs Forest Lakes-SanfordWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaren Ward / Krystle Myer vs Christine Eagleson / Anna Sisman6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-30vs Farmington Lobs of Fun-CowenSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMaren Ward vs Kendall Southmayd7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBlair Hubbard / Margie Halinski vs Jeanette Wang / Susan Brooks6-0, 6-2
L#1 DoublesLeah Burger / Maren Ward vs Jill Lord / Shannon Mrazik1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMargie Halinski / Blair Hubbard vs Ann Hay Hardy / Olivia Wages3-6, 3-6
2025-04-16vs BHSC Volley Girls-KastendikeLost 01
L#1 DoublesKrystle Myer / Blair Hubbard vs Polly Hunter / Esther Cho2-6, 1-6
2025-04-09vs Glenmore-EgidiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaren Ward / Krystle Myer vs Allison Egidi / Ayla Dugan6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBlair Hubbard / Karen Lord vs Tamara Freeman / Marie Hassanova6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-06vs ACAC Racquettes-FoleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Ruiz / Blair Hubbard vs Jan Carroll / Hania Taha5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMaren Ward / Erika Herz vs Martha Donnelly / Diane Simon1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Maren Ward
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.04
Karen Lord
published
2.75
Elizabeth Beasley
published
2.66
Leah Burger
published
2.60
Margie Halinski
published
2.52
Blair Hubbard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.46
2.28
Erika Herz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Maren Ward
98W–67L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
Karen Lord
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Elizabeth Beasley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Leah Burger
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Margie Halinski
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Blair Hubbard
26W–61L career · 8 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Karen Christoffersen
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Erika Herz
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.