← Teams

MAC-Leedy

2019 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.43 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Jim DeWeese
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Jeffrey Bayless
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Glenn Eisen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Rudy Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Zachary Wright
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-06-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKim Wright / Zachary Wright vs Janet Cathcart / Kevin Meier6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Robert Crawford vs Jayne Mitchell / Lance Lipscomb7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRita DeWeese / Jim DeWeese vs Mary Head / Gerald Chase1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-06-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesZachary Wright / Kim Wright vs Kim Wheeler / Jim Wheeler6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Rudy Martinez vs Janice Ackley / Allen VanLeuven6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Burczak / Jeffrey Bayless vs Linda Binns / William Maddox6-0, 6-4
2019-06-02Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesZachary Wright / Kim Wright vs Kevin Semonsen / Marianne Conroy6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Rudy Martinez vs Chip Rosenfeld / Nora Semonsen6-1, 6-3
2019-05-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKim Wright / Zachary Wright vs Vicki Blunt / John Wallin6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Burczak / Matthew Casimo vs Tamara Phillips / Jon Mandeville6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Robert Crawford vs Karen Pickering / Jerry Bond6-4, 7-5
2019-05-17Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKim Wright / Glenn Eisen vs Mike Baker / Sharon Vipond6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBeth Burczak / Jeffrey Bayless vs Mike Mullen / Diane Macdonald6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2019-05-03Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKim Wright / Zachary Wright vs Lynn Hendrix / JT Smith7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Rudy Martinez vs Carol Adams / Bob Towne6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBeth Burczak / Jim DeWeese vs Claudia Belindean / Wei Pan6-4, 6-2
2019-04-19Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Rudy Martinez vs Danny Denning / Frederique Lavios7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Glenn Eisen vs Kathleen Budnick / Paul Best6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristin Eckelman / Jeffrey Bayless vs Paul Kachel / Nora Semonsen6-2, 6-4
2019-04-06Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRita DeWeese / Jim DeWeese vs Clay Funkhouser / Kerry Sanford6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZachary Wright / Kim Wright vs Abbas Mottaghi / Bonnie Bailey6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Catherine Leedy vs Brian Quiner / Wendy Vaughn2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jim DeWeese
89W–73L career
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Jeffrey Bayless
130W–100L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Glenn Eisen
57W–50L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Rudy Martinez
45W–105L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–142L career
3%97%0%
3.17
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.